Academic Journal

Age-Related Differences in Metacognitive Reactivity in Younger and Older Adults

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Age-Related Differences in Metacognitive Reactivity in Younger and Older Adults
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Dillon H. Murphy (ORCID 0000-0002-5604-3494), Matthew G. Rhodes, Alan D. Castel (ORCID 0000-0003-1965-8227)
المصدر: Metacognition and Learning. 2024 19(3):863-877.
الاتاحة: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
تاريخ النشر: 2024
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Metacognition, Memory, Young Adults, Older Adults, Age Differences, Recall (Psychology), Cues, Prediction, Probability, Difficulty Level, Cognitive Processes
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-024-09391-0
تدمد: 1556-1623
1556-1631
مستخلص: When we monitor our learning, often measured via judgments of learning (JOLs), this metacognitive process can change what is remembered. For example, prior work has demonstrated that making JOLs enhances memory for related, but not unrelated, word pairs in younger adults. In the current study, we examined potential age-related differences in metacognitive reactivity. Younger and older adults studied lists of related and unrelated word pairs to remember for a later cued recall test where they would be presented with one of the words from the pair and be asked to recall its associate. Additionally, participants either made a JOL for each pair or had an inter-stimulus interval of equal duration as the JOL period. Results revealed that while making metacognitive judgments did not significantly affect memory in younger adults (i.e., no reactivity), this procedure impaired memory in older adults (i.e., negative reactivity), particularly for unrelated word pairs. Specifically, older adults demonstrated better cued recall when each word was followed by an inter-stimulus interval than when asked to predict the likelihood of remembering each word during the study phase. This may be a consequence of JOLs increasing task demands/cognitive load, which could reduce the elaborative encoding of associations between word pairs in older adults, but older adults' preserved or even enhanced semantic memory may mask negative reactivity for related word pairs. Future work is needed to better understand the mechanisms contributing to the reactivity effects in younger and older adults for different types of to-be-remembered information.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
رقم الانضمام: EJ1445585
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:1556-1623
1556-1631
DOI:10.1007/s11409-024-09391-0