Academic Journal

Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic Repaired with Composite Resin

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic Repaired with Composite Resin
المؤلفون: Colares, Regina Claudia Ramos, Neri, Jiovanne Rabelo, Souza, Andre Mattos Brito de, Pontes, Karina Matthes de Freitas, Mendonca, Juliano Sartori, Santiago, Sergio Lima
المصدر: Brazilian Dental Journal. August 2013 24(4)
بيانات النشر: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto, 2013.
سنة النشر: 2013
مصطلحات موضوعية: surface treatment, lithium disilicate ceramic, bond strength
الوصف: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for µTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). µTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher µTBS than G3 (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p>0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: text/html
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0103-6440
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201301960
URL الوصول: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400349
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
رقم الانضمام: edssci.S0103.64402013000400349
قاعدة البيانات: SciELO
الوصف
تدمد:01036440
DOI:10.1590/0103-6440201301960