In defense of weird hypotheticals

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:	In defense of weird hypotheticals
المؤلفون:	Spellman, Barbara A.
المصدر:	Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio; Núm. 2 (2021); 325-337
Publication Status:	published
بيانات النشر:	Universitat de Girona, 2021.
سنة النشر:	2021
مصطلحات موضوعية:	Legal espistemology, reasoning, metacognition, psychology and law, legal epistemology
الوصف:	Professor Allen (this issue) critiques the value of using “weird” hypotheticals to mine intuitions about legal systems. I respond by supporting the value of “thin” hypotheticals for providing information about how people reason generally, rather than for revealing peoples’ specific answers. I note that because legal systems are the products of many minds thinking about how other minds operate, the object of inquiry is metacognition—that is, understanding how reasoning works.
نوع الوثيقة:	article
وصف الملف:	application/pdf
تدمد:	2604-6202 2660-4515
Relation:	http://www.raco.cat/index.php/quaestio-facti/article/view/399495/492750
URL الوصول:	http://www.raco.cat/index.php/quaestio-facti/article/view/399495
رقم الانضمام:	edsrac.399495
قاعدة البيانات:	RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert)

الوصف
تدمد:	26046202 26604515