Trip optimizer method, system and computer software code for operating a railroad train to minimize wheel and track wear

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Trip optimizer method, system and computer software code for operating a railroad train to minimize wheel and track wear
Patent Number: 9,233,696
تاريخ النشر: January 12, 2016
Appl. No: 12/573141
Application Filed: October 04, 2009
مستخلص: A system for controlling a railroad train over a segment of track. The system comprises a first element for determining a location of the train on the segment of track; a second element for providing track characterization information for the segment of track; the track characterization information related to physical conditions of the segment of track; and a processor for controlling applied tractive forces and braking forces of the train responsive to the location of the train and the track characterization information to reduce at least one of wheel wear and/or track wear during operation of the train over the segment of track.
Inventors: Kumar, Ajith Kuttannair (Erie, PA, US); Daum, Wolfgang (Erie, PA, US); Shaffer, Glenn Robert (Erie, PA, US); Houpt, Paul Kenneth (Schenectady, NY, US); Noffsinger, Joseph Forrest (Lees Summit, MO, US); McKay, David Lowell (Melbourne, FL, US)
Assignees: General Electric Company (Schenectady, NY, US)
Claim: 1. A system comprising: a first element for determining a location of a train on a segment of track; a second element for providing track characterization information for the segment of track, the track characterization information related to physical conditions of the segment of track; and one or more processors for determining a trip plan based on the location of the train, the track characterization information, and one or more of a calculated amount of wear of a wheel of the train or a calculated amount of wear of the track caused by travel of the train over the track, wherein the train is at least one of automatically controlled according to the trip plan or is manually controlled by a train operator according to the trip plan.
Claim: 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more processors are configured to develop an updated trip plan responsive to updated track characterization information supplied to the second element during traversal of the train over the segment of track.
Claim: 3. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine in-train forces based on the trip plan and to develop an updated trip plan responsive to determining the in-train forces and based on the location of the train, the track characterization information, and the one or more of the calculated amount of wear of the wheel of the train or the calculated amount of wear of the track caused by travel of the train over the track.
Claim: 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the trip plan such that a cant deficiency parameter representative of actual wear of the track is about zero.
Claim: 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the track characterization information represents identification of a wheel slip in the segment of track for a previous train traveling over the segment of track.
Claim: 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the track characterization information includes a weather condition at the segment of track.
Claim: 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the second element is configured to determine a grade of the segment of track as the track characterization information, the grade determined from tractive power and acceleration used to travel over the segment of track.
Claim: 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the track characterization information includes at least one of a curve length, a curve radius, or an amount of divergence at a track switch within the segment of track.
Claim: 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the track characterization information includes at least one of track friction, friction of the wheel, track stability, track warping, track humping, track age, track type, track hardness, or a coefficient of friction between the wheel of the train and the track within the segment of track.
Claim: 10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the track characterization information includes a dimension of the wheel of the train.
Claim: 11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the one or more of the calculated amount of wear of the wheel of the train or the calculated amount of wear of the track based on a calculated rate of wear of one or more of the wheel or the track, the calculated rate of wear determined from one or more of a lateral force exerted on the track by the train, a lateral force exerted on the track by the train, a radius of curvature of the track, a gauge of the track, a cant of the track relative to the radius of curvature of the track, a profile of a portion of the track that contacts the wheel of the train, a geometry of the wheel, or a number of axles of the train.
Claim: 12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the trip plan as designating speed of the train as a function of one or more of distance or time, the one or more processors configured to determine the trip plan to reduce the one or more of the calculated amount of wear of the wheel or the calculated amount of wear of the track relative to the train traveling over the segment of the track according to one or more of speed or power settings that differ from the trip plan, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to calculate the one or more of the calculated amount of wear of the wheel of the train or the calculated amount of wear of the track from a difference between a super-elevation of the segment of the track and a ratio of a gauge of the segment of the track to one or more of a radius of curvature of the segment of the track, the speed of the train as designated by the trip plan, or gravitational acceleration.
Claim: 13. A method comprising: determining a location of a vehicle on a segment of a route; obtaining route characterization information for the segment of the route, the route characterization information related to a physical condition of the segment of the route; and creating a trip plan for the vehicle based on the location of the vehicle, the route characterization information, and one or more of a rate of wear of a wheel of the vehicle or a rate of wear of the route, wherein the trip plan is created to be used to automatically control operations of the vehicle or to instruct an operator to manually control the operations of the vehicle according to the trip plan.
Claim: 14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising revising the trip plan into an updated trip plan responsive to updated track characterization information being received either during traversal of the vehicle over the segment of the route.
Claim: 15. The method of claim 13 , further comprising determining in-vehicle forces based on the trip plan and revising the trip plan into an updated trip plan responsive thereto and further responsive to the location of the vehicle, the route characterization information, and the one or more of the rate of wear of the wheel or the rate of wear of the route.
Claim: 16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the trip plan is created such that a cant deficiency parameter representative of actual wear of the track is about zero.
Claim: 17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the route characterization information represents identification of a wheel slip in the segment of the route for a previous vehicle traveling over the segment of the route.
Claim: 18. The method of claim 13 , wherein the route characterization information represents a weather condition at the segment of the route.
Claim: 19. The method of claim 13 , further comprising determining a grade of the segment of the route as the route characterization information, the grade determined from tractive power and acceleration used to travel over the segment of the route.
Claim: 20. The method of claim 13 , wherein the route characterization information includes at least one of a curve length, a curve radius, or an amount of divergence at a switch within the segment of the route.
Claim: 21. The method of claim 13 , wherein the route characterization information includes at least one of route friction, friction of the wheel, route stability, route warping, route humping, route age, route type, route hardness, or a coefficient of friction between the wheel of the vehicle and the route within the segment of the route.
Claim: 22. The method of claim 13 , wherein the route characterization information includes a dimension of the wheel of the vehicle.
Claim: 23. A system comprising: a location determining element configured to identify a location of a vehicle on a route; a route characterization element configured to obtain route characterization information that is representative of one or more physical conditions of the route; and one or more processors configured to determine a trip plan based on the location of the vehicle on the route, the route characterization information, and one or more of a rate of wear of a wheel of the vehicle or a rate of wear of the route, the one or more processors configured to determine the trip plan so that the trip plan can be used to one or more of automatically control operations of the vehicle or to direct manual control of the operations of the vehicle by an operator according to the trip plan, wherein the trip plan designates operational settings of the vehicle as a function of at least one of distance or time along the route.
Claim: 24. The system of claim 23 , wherein one or more processors are configured to develop an updated trip plan responsive to updated track characterization information being obtained by the route characterization element during or prior to traversal of the vehicle over the route.
Claim: 25. The system of claim 23 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine an in-vehicle force based on the trip plan and to develop an updated trip plan responsive to the in-vehicle forces, the location of the vehicle, the route characterization information, and the one or more of the rate of wear of the wheel or the rate of wear of the route.
Claim: 26. The system of claim 23 , wherein the track characterization information represents identification of a wheel slip in a segment of the route for a previous trip of the vehicle or another vehicle over the segment of the route.
Claim: 27. The system of claim 26 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine or modify the trip plan within the segment of the route based on the identification of the wheel slip in the previous trip.
Claim: 28. The system of claim 23 , wherein the track characterization information represents a weather condition in a segment of the route.
Claim: 29. The system of claim 23 , wherein the route characterization element is configured to determine a grade of a segment of the route as the route characterization information, the grade determined from tractive power and acceleration used by the vehicle or another vehicle during travel over the segment of the route during a previous trip.
Claim: 30. The system of claim 23 , wherein the route characterization information includes at least one of a curve length, a curve radius, or an amount of divergence at a switch within a segment of the route.
Claim: 31. The system of claim 23 , wherein the route characterization information includes at least one of route friction, friction of the wheel, route stability, route warping, route humping, route age, route type, route hardness, or a coefficient of friction between the wheel of the vehicle and the route within a segment of the route.
Claim: 32. The system of claim 23 , wherein the route characterization information includes a dimension of the wheel of the vehicle.
Patent References Cited: 2104652 January 1938 Inman
2601634 June 1952 Rivette
2927711 March 1960 Naggiar
3519805 July 1970 Thorne-Booth
3650216 March 1972 Harwick et al.
3655962 April 1972 Koch
3718040 February 1973 Freeman et al.
3781139 December 1973 Lohse
3794833 February 1974 Blazek et al.
3865042 February 1975 DePaola et al.
3886870 June 1975 Pelabon
3948314 April 1976 Creswick et al.
4005838 February 1977 Grundy
4041283 August 1977 Mosier
4042810 August 1977 Mosher
4136432 January 1979 Melley, Jr.
4181943 January 1980 Mercer et al.
4253399 March 1981 Spigarelli
4279395 July 1981 Boggio
4344364 August 1982 Nickles et al.
4355582 October 1982 Germer
4401035 August 1983 Spigarelli et al.
4548164 October 1985 Ylonen et al.
4561057 December 1985 Haley et al.
4602335 July 1986 Perlmutter
4617627 October 1986 Yasunobu et al.
4644705 February 1987 Saccomani et al.
4663713 May 1987 Cornell et al.
4711418 December 1987 Aver et al.
4735385 April 1988 Nickles et al.
4794548 December 1988 Lynch et al.
4827438 May 1989 Nickles et al.
4843575 June 1989 Crane
4853883 August 1989 Nickles et al.
5109343 April 1992 Budway
5181541 January 1993 Bodenheimer
5187945 February 1993 Dixon
5197627 March 1993 Disabato et al.
5239472 August 1993 Long et al.
5240416 August 1993 Bennington
5253153 October 1993 Mathews et al.
5316174 May 1994 Schutz
5363787 November 1994 Konopasek et al.
5388034 February 1995 Allen et al.
5398894 March 1995 Pascoe
5437422 August 1995 Newman
5440489 August 1995 Newman
5460013 October 1995 Thomsen
5487516 January 1996 Murata et al.
5623413 April 1997 Matheson et al.
5642827 July 1997 Madsen
5651330 July 1997 Jewett
5676059 October 1997 Alt
5720455 February 1998 Kull et al.
5738311 April 1998 Fernandez
5740547 April 1998 Kull et al.
5744707 April 1998 Kull
5755349 May 1998 Brundle
5758299 May 1998 Sandborg et al.
5785392 July 1998 Hart
5794172 August 1998 Matheson et al.
5803411 September 1998 Ackerman et al.
5813635 September 1998 Fernandez
5820226 October 1998 Hart
5828979 October 1998 Polivka et al.
5833325 November 1998 Hart
5927822 July 1999 Hart
5934764 August 1999 Dimsa et al.
5950967 September 1999 Montgomery
5957571 September 1999 Koster et al.
5969643 October 1999 Curtis
5978718 November 1999 Kull
5986577 November 1999 Bezos
5986579 November 1999 Halvorson
5995881 November 1999 Kull
5998915 December 1999 Scholz et al.
6092021 July 2000 Ehlbeck et al.
6112142 August 2000 Shockley et al.
6114974 September 2000 Halvorson
6123111 September 2000 Nathan et al.
6125311 September 2000 Lo
6128558 October 2000 Kernwein
6129025 October 2000 Minakami et al.
6135396 October 2000 Whitfield et al.
6144901 November 2000 Nickles et al.
6163089 December 2000 Kull
6198993 March 2001 Higashi et al.
6216095 April 2001 Glista
6216957 April 2001 Turunen, Jr.
6230668 May 2001 Marsh et al.
6243694 June 2001 Bonissone et al.
6263266 July 2001 Hawthorne
6269034 July 2001 Shibuya
6270040 August 2001 Katzer
6275165 August 2001 Bezos
6308117 October 2001 Ryland et al.
6322025 November 2001 Colbert et al.
6325050 December 2001 Gallagher et al.
6332106 December 2001 Hawthorne et al.
6360998 March 2002 Halvorson et al.
6363331 March 2002 Kyrtsos
6377215 April 2002 Halvorson et al.
6380639 April 2002 Soucy
6404129 June 2002 Hendricx et al.
6434452 August 2002 Gray
6459964 October 2002 Vu et al.
6487488 November 2002 Peterson et al.
6505103 January 2003 Howell et al.
6516727 February 2003 Kraft
6520124 February 2003 Bohm, II
6549803 April 2003 Raghavan et al.
6591758 July 2003 Kumar
6609049 August 2003 Kane et al.
6612245 September 2003 Kumar et al.
6612246 September 2003 Kumar
6615118 September 2003 Kumar
6647328 November 2003 Walker
6676089 January 2004 Katzer
6694231 February 2004 Rezk
6698913 March 2004 Yamamoto
6702235 March 2004 Katzer
6732023 May 2004 Sugita et al.
6763291 July 2004 Houpt et al.
6782044 August 2004 Wright et al.
6789005 September 2004 Hawthorne
6810312 October 2004 Jammu et al.
6824110 November 2004 Kane et al.
6845953 January 2005 Kane et al.
6856865 February 2005 Hawthorne
6863246 March 2005 Kane et al.
6865454 March 2005 Kane et al.
6873888 March 2005 Kumar
6903658 June 2005 Kane et al.
6910792 June 2005 Takada et al.
6915191 July 2005 Kane et al.
6922619 July 2005 Baig et al.
6948837 September 2005 Suzuki
6953272 October 2005 Hayakawa et al.
6957131 October 2005 Kane et al.
6973947 December 2005 Penaloza et al.
6978195 December 2005 Kane et al.
6980894 December 2005 Gordon et al.
6996461 February 2006 Kane et al.
7021588 April 2006 Hess et al.
7021589 April 2006 Hess et al.
7024289 April 2006 Kane et al.
7036774 May 2006 Kane et al.
7072747 July 2006 Armbruster et al.
7072757 July 2006 Adams et al.
7073753 July 2006 Root et al.
7079926 July 2006 Kane et al.
7092800 August 2006 Kane et al.
7092801 August 2006 Kane et al.
7092894 August 2006 Crone
7096171 August 2006 Hawthorne et al.
7127336 October 2006 Houpt et al.
7131403 November 2006 Banga et al.
7164975 January 2007 Bidaud
7222083 May 2007 Matheson et al.
7302895 December 2007 Kumar et al.
7340328 March 2008 Matheson et al.
7343314 March 2008 Matheson et al.
7347168 March 2008 Reckels et al.
7349797 March 2008 Donnelly et al.
7416262 August 2008 Ring
7497201 March 2009 Hollenbeck
7500436 March 2009 Kumar et al.
7509193 March 2009 Kustosch
7522990 April 2009 Daum et al.
7539624 May 2009 Matheson et al.
7558740 July 2009 Matheson et al.
7618011 November 2009 Oleski et al.
7667611 February 2010 Lindsey et al.
8157218 April 2012 Riley et al.
8428798 April 2013 Kull
2001/0029411 October 2001 Hawthorne
2001/0047241 November 2001 Khavakh et al.
2002/0059075 May 2002 Schick et al.
2002/0072833 June 2002 Gray
2002/0093201 July 2002 Soucy
2002/0096081 July 2002 Kraft
2002/0107618 August 2002 Deguchi et al.
2002/0174653 November 2002 Uzkan
2003/0001050 January 2003 Katzer
2003/0034423 February 2003 Hess, Jr. et al.
2003/0076221 April 2003 Akiyama et al.
2003/0091017 May 2003 Davenport et al.
2003/0104899 June 2003 Keller
2003/0105561 June 2003 Nickles et al.
2003/0120400 June 2003 Ahmed Baig et al.
2003/0183729 October 2003 Root et al.
2003/0213875 November 2003 Hess et al.
2003/0222981 December 2003 Kisak et al.
2003/0229446 December 2003 Boscamp et al.
2003/0233959 December 2003 Kumar
2004/0010432 January 2004 Matheson et al.
2004/0034556 February 2004 Matheson et al.
2004/0038831 February 2004 Eadie
2004/0068359 April 2004 Neiss et al.
2004/0075280 April 2004 Kumar et al.
2004/0093245 May 2004 Matheson et al.
2004/0098142 May 2004 Warren et al.
2004/0104312 June 2004 Hess, Jr. et al.
2004/0108814 June 2004 Tsuda et al.
2004/0111309 June 2004 Matheson et al.
2004/0122569 June 2004 Bidaud
2004/0129289 July 2004 Hafemann
2004/0133315 July 2004 Kumar et al.
2004/0172175 September 2004 Julich et al.
2004/0174121 September 2004 Tsuda et al.
2004/0245410 December 2004 Kisak et al.
2005/0007020 January 2005 Tsuda et al.
2005/0055287 March 2005 Schmidtberg et al.
2005/0065674 March 2005 Houpt et al.
2005/0085961 April 2005 Kane et al.
2005/0109882 May 2005 Armbruster et al.
2005/0120904 June 2005 Kumar et al.
2005/0121005 June 2005 Edwards
2005/0121971 June 2005 Ring
2005/0171655 August 2005 Flynn et al.
2005/0171657 August 2005 Kumar
2005/0188745 September 2005 Staphanos et al.
2005/0196737 September 2005 Mann
2005/0205719 September 2005 Hendrickson et al.
2005/0234757 October 2005 Matheson et al.
2005/0251299 November 2005 Donnelly et al.
2005/0288832 December 2005 Smith et al.
2006/0041341 February 2006 Kane et al.
2006/0047379 March 2006 Schullian et al.
2006/0060345 March 2006 Flik et al.
2006/0085103 April 2006 Smith, Jr. et al.
2006/0085363 April 2006 Cheng et al.
2006/0116789 June 2006 Subramanian et al.
2006/0116795 June 2006 Abe et al.
2006/0122737 June 2006 Tani et al.
2006/0155434 July 2006 Kane et al.
2006/0162973 July 2006 Harris et al.
2006/0212188 September 2006 Kickbusch et al.
2006/0277906 December 2006 Burk et al.
2006/0282199 December 2006 Daum et al.
2007/0061053 March 2007 Zeitzew
2007/0112475 May 2007 Koebler et al.
2007/0219680 September 2007 Kumar et al.
2007/0219681 September 2007 Kumar et al.
2007/0219683 September 2007 Daum et al.
2007/0233364 October 2007 Kumar
2007/0260369 November 2007 Philp et al.
2007/0261648 November 2007 Reckels et al.
2008/0004721 January 2008 Huff et al.
2008/0128563 June 2008 Kumar et al.
2008/0147256 June 2008 Liberatore
2008/0208393 August 2008 Schricker
2009/0063045 March 2009 Figueroa et al.
2009/0140574 June 2009 Gorman et al.
2009/0177345 July 2009 Severinsky et al.
2009/0254239 October 2009 Daum et al.
2009/0319092 December 2009 Piche
2010/0152998 June 2010 Schwarzmann
642 418 April 1984
197 26 542 November 1998
199 35 349 February 2001
199 35 353 February 2001
100 45 921 March 2002
0 594 226 September 1990
0 428 113 November 1990
0 445 047 September 1991
0 485 978 May 1992
0 554 983 August 1993
1 136 969 July 2002
1 466 803 October 2004
1 253 059 August 2006
2 129 215 October 1972
2 558 806 January 1984
2 767 770 September 1997
482 625 December 1936
60 028153 February 1985
50-32733 September 1993
06-108869 April 1994
2001-065360 March 2001
WO 95/25053 September 1995
WO 99/14093 March 1999
WO9960735 November 1999
WO 03/097424 November 2003
WO 2004/023517 March 2004
WO 2004/051699 June 2004
WO 2004/051700 June 2004
WO 2004/052755 June 2004
WO 2004/059446 July 2004
WO 2005/061300 July 2005
WO 2007/027130 March 2007
WO 2007/091270 August 2007
WO2010039680 April 2010
200101708 August 2001





















Other References: Razouqi et al. RYNSORD: A Novel, Decentralized Algorithm for Railway Networks with ‘Soft Reservation’, VTC, 1998, pp. 1585-2589, V3, New York, NY. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2009/032933 dated Nov. 3, 2009. cited by applicant
Chang et al. “Cycle Detection in Repair-Based Railway Scheduling System”, Robotics and Automation, 1996 pp. 2517-2522, V3, New York, NY. cited by applicant
Grabs, Ulrike, “Modification of Electronic Interlocking EI S in Service”, Signal + Draht, Telzlaff Verlag GmbH, 1995, pp. 254-258, V87(7/08), Darmstadt, DE. cited by applicant
Cheng, Yu, “Hybrid Simulation for Resolving Resource conflicts in Train Traffic Rescheduling”, Computers in Industry, 1998, pp. 233-246, V35(3), Amsterdam, NL. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT US2006/032893 dated Aug. 24, 2006. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/001428 dated Jan. 18, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/066697 dated Apr. 16, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/076699 dated Aug. 24, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/078001 dated Sep. 10, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/078016 dated Sep. 10, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/078118 dated Sep. 11, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2007/078340 dated Sep. 13, 2007. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2008/063193 dated May 9, 2008. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2008/083526 dated Nov. 14, 2008. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2009/031740 dated Jan. 23, 2009. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2009/032933 dated Feb. 3, 2009. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2009/037293 dated Mar. 16, 2009. cited by applicant
ISR and WO pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2009/045004 dated May 22, 2009. cited by applicant
ISR pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2010/035058 dated May 17, 2010. cited by applicant
ISR pertaining to International application No. PCT/US2010/047251 dated Aug. 31, 2010. cited by applicant
Hooper, N.E.; Railway Track and Structures; “Reducing Rail Costs through Innovative Methods”, Jul. 1993; pp. 14-17. cited by applicant
Assistant Examiner: King, Rodney P
Primary Examiner: Mawari, Redhwan k
Attorney, Agent or Firm: GE Global Patent Operation
Kramer, John A.
رقم الانضمام: edspgr.09233696
قاعدة البيانات: USPTO Patent Grants