Electronic Resource
Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews : A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses
| العنوان: | Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews : A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Wu, Y., Levis, B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Benedetti, A., Thombs, B. D., Sundström Poromaa, Inger |
| بيانات النشر: | Uppsala universitet, Reproduktiv hälsa 2021 |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Electronic Resource |
| مستخلص: | Introduction: Three previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) reported that, compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID), alternative reference standards, primarily the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Mini International Neu- ropsychiatric Interview (MINI), tended to misclassify major depression status, when controlling for depression symp- tom severity. However, there was an important lack of pre- cision in the results. Objective: To compare the odds of the major depression classification based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI. Methods: We included and standardized data from 3 IPDMA databases. For each IPDMA, separately, we fitted bi- nomial generalized linear mixed models to compare the ad- justed odds ratios (aORs) of major depression classification, controlling for symptom severity and characteristics of par- ticipants, and the interaction between interview and symp- tom severity. Next, we synthesized results using a DerSimo- nian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis. Results: In total, 69,405 participants (7,574 [11%] with major depression) from 212 studies were included. Controlling for symptom severity and participant characteristics, the MINI (74 stud- ies; 25,749 participants) classified major depression more often than the SCID (108 studies; 21,953 participants; aOR 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.92]). Classification odds for the CIDI (30 studies; 21,703 participants) and the SCID did not differ overall (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79–1.75); however, as screening scores increased, the aOR increased less for the CIDI than the SCID (interaction aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52–0.80). Conclusions: Compared to the SCID, the MINI classified major depression more often. The odds of the de- pression classification with the CIDI increased less as symptom levels increased. Interpretation of research that uses diagnostic interviews to classify depression should consider the interview characteristics. |
| مصطلحات الفهرس: | Psychiatry, Psykiatri, Article in journal, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, text |
| DOI: | 10.1159.000509283 |
| URL: | Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 0033-3190, 2021, 90:1, s. 28-40 |
| الاتاحة: | Open access content. Open access content info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| ملاحظة: | English |
| Other Numbers: | UPE oai:DiVA.org:uu-430962 0000-0002-2491-2042 doi:10.1159/000509283 ISI:000599715100004 1235309500 |
| المصدر المساهم: | UPPSALA UNIV LIBR From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative. |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsoai.on1235309500 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OAIster |
| DOI: | 10.1159.000509283 |
|---|