Electronic Resource
政策限制與廠商行為: 以自製率和原產地原則為例
| العنوان: | 政策限制與廠商行為: 以自製率和原產地原則為例 |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | [[advisor]]蔡攀龍, [[advisor]]Tsai, Pan Long, 李昱瑩, Li, Yu Ying |
| بيانات النشر: | 2013 [[accessioned]]2014-09-10T03:17:04Z [[available]]2014-09-10T03:17:04Z [[issued]]2014-09-10T03:17:04Z |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Electronic Resource |
| مستخلص: | GH009572802 博士 經濟學系 [[abstract]]This dissertation uses three chapters to investigate the relationships between the conditional policies and the exporting behavior of firms. Two policies are discussed: the domestic content protection policy (DCPP) and the rules of origin (ROOs). In Chapter 1, by explicitly incorporating a physical content requirement scheme into the heterogeneous firm model, we examine how the imposition by Foreign country of the DCPP affects the behavior of Home final-goods firms. Two conclusions are obtained. First, a stricter DCPP and the higher transportation costs raise the burden of the DCPP compliance, leading to the decreasing Home labor wage rate, the decreasing number of Home firms with the DCPP compliance, and the increasing number of those with the DCPP noncompliance. Second, through raising the penalty tariff, the Foreign government can effectively increase the incentives of Home firms to obey the DCPP, whereas its effect on the Home labor wage rate is uncertain. Chapter 2 combines the intermediate sector and two types of the ROOs－ physical ROOs and value-added ROOs－in a Cournot duopoly model to investigate how ROOs influence the exporting behavior of the outside-FTA firm and how they protect the inside-FTA firm. It obtains four main findings. First, if the circumvention effect is less than double the cost difference effect, the ROOs are beneficial to the inside-FTA firm. Second, if the circumvention effect dominates the sum of the cost difference effect and the price discrimination effect, then the ROOs are more likely to benefit the outside-FTA firm under a loose ROOs requirement, a low substitutability between the two goods, a small market size difference, or low transportation costs. Third, and contrary to the results presented by Ishikawa et al. (2007), this chapter shows that an inside-FTA firm and an outside-FTA firm cannot both gain from the ROOs simultaneously. In particular, the ROOs are not necessarily beneficial to the inside-FTA firm, challengi |
| مصطلحات الفهرس: | domestic content protection policy;rules of originv(ROOs);free trade area (FTA);foreign direct investment (FDI);firm heterogeneity;firm productivity;firm behavior, [[classification]]40, thesis |
| الاتاحة: | Open access content. Open access content |
| ملاحظة: | [[extent]]98656 bytes [[mimetype]]application/pdf [[iso]]en |
| Other Numbers: | TWNTH oai:nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw:987654321/84128 [[uri]]http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/84128 894618678 |
| المصدر المساهم: | NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIV From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative. |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsoai.ocn894618678 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OAIster |
| الوصف غير متاح. |