Academic Journal

Implantable loop recorders in patients with heart disease: comparison between patients with and without syncope

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Implantable loop recorders in patients with heart disease: comparison between patients with and without syncope
المؤلفون: Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Michelle Michels, Tamas Szili-torok, Judith M A Verhagen, Rohit E Bhagwandien, Sing-Chien Yap, DOMINIC THEUNS, Amira Assaf, Rafi Sakhi
المصدر: Open Heart, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2021)
بيانات النشر: BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
مصطلحات موضوعية: Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701
الوصف: Objective Patients with heart disease are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Guidelines recommend an implantable loop recorder (ILR) for symptomatic patients when symptoms are sporadic and possibly arrhythmia-related. In clinical practice, an ILR is mainly used in patients with unexplained syncope. We aimed to compare the clinical value of an ILR in patients with heart disease and a history of syncope versus those with non-syncopal symptoms.Methods In this observational single-centre study, we included symptomatic patients with heart disease who received an ILR. The primary endpoint was an actionable event which was defined as an arrhythmic event leading to a change in clinical management. The secondary endpoint was an event leading to device implantation.Results One hundred and twenty patients (mean age 47±17 years, 49% men) were included. The underlying disease substrate was inherited cardiomyopathy (31%), congenital heart disease (28%), channelopathy (23%) and other (18%). Group A consisted of 43 patients with prior syncope and group B consisted of 77 patients with palpitations and/or near-syncope. The median follow-up duration was 19 months (IQR 8–36). The 3-year cumulative event rate was similar between groups with regard to the primary endpoint (38% vs 39% for group A and B, respectively, logrank p=0.54). There was also no difference in the 3-year cumulative rate of device implantation (21% vs 13% for group A and B, respectively, logrank p=0.65).Conclusion In symptomatic patients with heart disease, there is no difference in the yield of an ILR in patients presenting with or without syncope.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2053-3624
Relation: https://openheart.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001748.full; https://doaj.org/toc/2053-3624
DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001748
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/fd2c37e41fd4467eb9ef5494a3b0b12e
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.fd2c37e41fd4467eb9ef5494a3b0b12e
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20533624
DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001748