Academic Journal
Complementarity between the updated version of the front-of-pack nutrition label Nutri-Score and the food-processing NOVA classification
| العنوان: | Complementarity between the updated version of the front-of-pack nutrition label Nutri-Score and the food-processing NOVA classification |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Barthélemy Sarda, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Valérie Deschamps, Pauline Ducrot, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Melanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Bernard Srour, Leopold K Fezeu, Mathilde Touvier, Chantal Julia |
| المصدر: | Public Health Nutrition, Vol 27 (2024) |
| بيانات النشر: | Cambridge University Press, 2024. |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Public aspects of medicine LCC:Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Nutri-Score, Nutrient profiling system, NOVA, Food processing, Public health, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases, RC620-627 |
| الوصف: | Abstract Objective: To compare the initial and the updated versions of the front-of-pack label Nutri-Score (related to the nutritional content) with the NOVA classification (related to the degree of food processing) at the food level. Design: Using the OpenFoodFacts database – 129,950 food products – we assessed the complementarity between the Nutri-Score (initial and updated) with the NOVA classification through a correspondence analysis. Contingency tables between the two classification systems were used. Settings: The food offer in France. Participants: Not applicable. Results: With both versions (i.e. initial and updated) of the Nutri-Score, the majority of ultra-processed products received medium to poor Nutri-Score ratings (between 77·9 % and 87·5 % of ultra-processed products depending on the version of the algorithm). Overall, the update of the Nutri-Score algorithm led to a reduction in the number of products rated A and B and an increase in the number of products rated D or E for all NOVA categories, with unprocessed foods being the least impacted (–3·8 percentage points (–5·2 %) rated A or B and +1·3 percentage points (+12·9 %) rated D or E) and ultra-processed foods the most impacted (–9·8 percentage points (–43·4 %) rated A or B and +7·8 percentage points (+14·1 %) rated D or E). Among ultra-processed foods rated favourably with the initial Nutri-Score, artificially sweetened beverages, sweetened plant-based drinks and bread products were the most penalised categories by the revision of Nutri-Score while low-sugar flavoured waters, fruit and legume preparations were the least affected. Conclusion: These results indicate that the update of the Nutri-Score reinforces its coherence with the NOVA classification, even though both systems measure two distinct health dimensions at the food level. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 13689800 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
| Relation: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980024000296/type/journal_article; https://doaj.org/toc/1368-9800; https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2727 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S1368980024000296 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/abef5158f28e4e03be1eb4904dea34a8 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.bef5158f28e4e03be1eb4904dea34a8 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 13689800 14752727 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1017/S1368980024000296 |