Academic Journal

Assessing tolerability with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy item GP5: psychometric evidence from LIBRETTO-531, a phase 3 trial of selpercatinib in medullary thyroid cancer

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Assessing tolerability with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy item GP5: psychometric evidence from LIBRETTO-531, a phase 3 trial of selpercatinib in medullary thyroid cancer
المؤلفون: Antoine Regnault, Laurine Bunod, Angely Loubert, Marcia S. Brose, Lisa M. Hess, Patricia Maeda, Yan Lin, Rebecca M. Speck, Adrienne M. Gilligan, Nalin Payakachat
المصدر: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024)
بيانات النشر: SpringerOpen, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Medullary thyroid cancer, Patient-reported tolerability, Psychometric analysis, FACT item GP5, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Abstract Background This psychometric analysis generated evidence to support the use of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy item GP5 (GP5) as a measure of tolerability and confirms the appropriateness of categorizing “high side-effect burden” using a rating of 3 or 4 (score ranges 0–4) in patients with advanced/metastatic RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Methodology Blinded, pooled interim data from the safety population (n=290) enrolled in the phase 3 LIBRETTO-531 trial (NCT04211337) were used. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for test-retest reliability using data from cycles 1-2 post-baseline. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the correlations of GP5 ratings with (a) symptomatic adverse events (AEs; measured by the PRO-CTCAE), and (b) functioning scores of EORTC QLQ-C30. The ability to detect change over time was examined by Cochrane-Mantel-Haenszel tests for GP5 ratings and PRO-CTCAE. The relationship of “high side-effect burden” categories with QLQ-C30 functioning scores was examined. Results ICCs for the GP5 ratings after cycle 1 ranged between 0.80 and 0.85, indicating good reliability. Correlations between GP5 and PRO-CTCAE items ranged from 0.18 to 0.62 and ranged from -0.37 to -0.50 for QLQ-C30 functioning scores, consistent with study assumptions. Post-baseline GP5 ratings showed significant associations with PRO-CTCAE scores (p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2509-8020
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2509-8020
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00823-8
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/9e4c0dc027c54c2486527e406556e3cd
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.9e4c0dc027c54c2486527e406556e3cd
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:25098020
DOI:10.1186/s41687-024-00823-8