Academic Journal
Constructing an evaluation index system for clinical nursing practice teaching quality using a Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process-based approach
| العنوان: | Constructing an evaluation index system for clinical nursing practice teaching quality using a Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process-based approach |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Shengxiao NIE, Lei WANG |
| المصدر: | BMC Medical Education, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2024) |
| بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2024. |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Special aspects of education LCC:Medicine |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Clinical nursing, Teaching quality, Evaluation, Index system, Delphi survey, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Special aspects of education, LC8-6691, Medicine |
| الوصف: | Abstract Background The key step in evaluating the quality of clinical nursing practice education lies in establishing a scientific, objective, and feasible index system. Current assessments of clinical teaching typically measure hospital learning environments, classroom teaching, teaching competency, or the internship quality of nursing students. As a result, clinical evaluations are often insufficient to provide focused feedback, guide faculty development, or identify specific areas for clinical teachers to implement change and improvement. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to to construct a scientific, systematic, and clinically applicable evaluation index system of clinical nursing practice teaching quality and determine each indicator’s weight to provide references for the scientific and objective evaluation of clinical nursing practice teaching quality. Methods Based on the “Structure-Process-Outcome” theoretical model, a literature review and Delphi surveys were conducted to establish the evaluation index system of clinical nursing practice teaching quality. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to determine the weight of each indicator. Results The effective response rate for the two rounds of expert surveys was 100%. The expert authority coefficients were 0.961 and 0.975, respectively. The coefficient of variation for the indicators at each level ranged from 0 to 0.25 and 0 to 0.21, and the Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.209 and 0.135, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1472-6920 |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6920 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12909-024-05770-y |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/988570c9168949d5a5a1989cbc501e83 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.988570c9168949d5a5a1989cbc501e83 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 14726920 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12909-024-05770-y |