Academic Journal

Pseudoanginal chest pain associated with vagal nerve stimulation: a case report

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Pseudoanginal chest pain associated with vagal nerve stimulation: a case report
المؤلفون: James B. Nichols, Abigail P. McCallum, Nicolas K. Khattar, George Z. Wei, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Haring J. W. Nauta, Joseph S. Neimat
المصدر: BMC Neurology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2020)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
المجموعة: LCC:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
مصطلحات موضوعية: Vagal nerve stimulation, Typical angina, Spinothalamic tract, Convergence, Epilepsy, Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system, RC346-429
الوصف: Abstract Background Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can be an effective therapy for patients with epilepsy refractory to anti-epileptic drugs or intracranial surgery. While generally well tolerated, it has been associated with laryngospasm, hoarseness, coughing, dyspnea, throat and atypical chest pain, cardiac symptoms such as bradycardia and occasionally asystole. We report on a patient receiving vagal nerve stimulation who experienced severe typical anginal chest pain during VNS firing without any evidence of cardiac ischemia or dysfunction. Thus, the pain appeared to be neuropathic from the stimulation itself rather than nociceptive secondary to an effect on heart function. Case presentation A 29-year-old man, with a history of intractable frontal lobe epilepsy refractory to seven anti-epileptic medications and subsequent intracranial surgery, underwent VNS implantation without complications. On beginning stimulation, he began to have intermittent chest pain that corresponded temporally to his intermittent VNS firing. The description of his pain was pathognomonic of ischemic cardiac chest pain. On initial evaluation, he displayed Levine’s sign and reported crushing substernal chest pain radiating to the left arm, as well as shortness of breath walking upstairs that improved with rest. He underwent an extensive cardiac workup, including 12-lead ECG, cardiac stress test, echocardiogram, 12-day ambulatory cardiac monitoring, and continuous ECG monitoring each with and without stimulation of his device. The workup was consistently negative. Inability to resolve the pain necessitated the disabling and eventual removal of the device. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report of pseudoanginal chest pain associated with VNS. This occurrence prompted our review of the mechanisms of cardiac chest pain and suggests that vagal afferents may convey anginal pain separately or in parallel with known spinal cord pain mechanisms. These insights into the physiology of chest pain may be of general interest and important to surgeons implanting VNS devices who may potentially encounter such symptoms.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2377
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-020-01693-5; https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2377
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01693-5
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/930ebb0f0cb34a46b17a787271e51390
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.930ebb0f0cb34a46b17a787271e51390
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712377
DOI:10.1186/s12883-020-01693-5