Academic Journal

Practice Variation in the Management of Adult Hydroceles: A Multinational Survey

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Practice Variation in the Management of Adult Hydroceles: A Multinational Survey
المؤلفون: Mikko Forss, Kostiantyn Bolsunovskyi, Yung Lee, Tuomas P. Kilpeläinen, Yoshitaka Aoki, Sigurdur Gudjonsson, François Hervé, Petrus Järvinen, Sachin Malde, Katsuhito Miyazawa, Jukka Sairanen, Lotte Sander, Philippe D. Violette, Lambertus P.W. Witte, Gordon H. Guyatt, Kari A.O. Tikkinen
المصدر: European Urology Open Science, Vol 58, Iss , Pp 1-7 (2023)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: Hydrocele, Physicians’ practice patterns, Practice variation, Surgical procedures, operative, Survey, Treatment outcome, Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology, RC870-923, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: Background: Although hydrocele is one of the most common urologic pathologies, it is seldom studied, and the major urologic associations have no guidelines for the management of adult hydroceles. Objective: To characterize international practice variation in the treatment of adult hydroceles. Design, setting, and participants: An international survey was conducted addressing the management of hydroceles among urologists in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Japan, and the Netherlands from September to December 2020. We invited a random sample of 170 urologists from each country (except Iceland). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Urologists’ treatment options, factors relevant for decision-making, expected patient satisfaction, and outcomes after aspiration versus surgery were assessed. Results and limitations: Of the 864 urologists contacted, 437 (51%) participated. Of the respondents, 202 (53%) performed both hydrocelectomies and aspiration, 147 (39%) performed hydrocelectomies only, and 30 (8%) performed aspiration only. In Belgium (83%), the Netherlands (75%), and Denmark (55%), urologists primarily performed hydrocelectomies only, whereas in Finland (84%), Japan (61%), and Iceland (91%), urologists performed both hydrocelectomies and aspiration. Urologists favored hydrocelectomy for large hydroceles (78.8% vs 37.5% for small), younger patients (66.0% for patients
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2666-1683
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323010856; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-1683
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.005
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/879c4165cbc540d1b9aafeb4e50a6996
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.879c4165cbc540d1b9aafeb4e50a6996
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:26661683
DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.005