Academic Journal
Comparative analysis of surgical interventions for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
| العنوان: | Comparative analysis of surgical interventions for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Liyou Hu, Xiaolei Deng, Bo Wei, Jian Wang, Decai Hou |
| المصدر: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2023) |
| بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2023. |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Orthopedic surgery LCC:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Femoral head osteonecrosis, Bone graft, Network meta-analysis, Surgical intervention, Clinical randomized controlled trials, Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, RC925-935 |
| الوصف: | Abstract Background Despite several surgical options, there remains no consensus regarding the optimal approach for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a prevalent and refractory disease. To determine the most suitable treatment modality, we compared randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated multiple surgical treatments for ONFH using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods The outcomes of 11 different surgical treatments were assessed using NMA comparisons of the rate of progression of femoral head necrosis, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and improvement of the Harris hip score (HHS). A random effects model was used to analyze the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized trials. The confidence of the results was assessed using the confidence in network meta-analysis tool. Results A total of 18 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with core decompression (CD), the forest plot showed that autologous bone grafting (ABG), free fibula grafting (FFG), vascularized bone grafting (VBG), autologous bone grafting combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ABG + BMAC), and biomaterial grafting combined with vascularized bone grafting (BMG + VBG) delayed ONFH progression. Among them, ABG + BMAC showed the most promising results (OR 0.019; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0012–0.25). However, upon comparing CD with different surgical modalities, no significant differences were found in preventing total hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the HHS due to attribution and high heterogeneity across the studies. Conclusion Overall, ABG, VBG, FFG, ABG + BMAC, and BMG + VBG showed significant results in preventing ONFH progression compared with that shown by CD. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking, ABG + BMAC was the most effective. Moreover, all treatments involving bone grafting were found to be effective, possibly indicating the necessity of its use in the treatment of ONFH. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1749-799X |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1749-799X |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s13018-023-04463-4 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/83f85303e515478c9ae81f348939d172 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.83f85303e515478c9ae81f348939d172 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1749799X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s13018-023-04463-4 |