Academic Journal

Multiple Pipeline Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Complex Intracranial Aneurysm: A Multi-Center Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Multiple Pipeline Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Complex Intracranial Aneurysm: A Multi-Center Study
المؤلفون: Feng Fan, Yu Fu, Jianmin Liu, Xinjian Yang, Hongqi Zhang, Tianxiao Li, Huaizhang Shi, Jieqing Wan, Yuanli Zhao, Yunyan Wang, Wenfeng Feng, Donglei Song, Yang Wang, Guohua Mao, Aisha Maimaitili, Sheng Guan
المصدر: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Vol 14 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
مصطلحات موضوعية: anterior circulation, giant intracranial aneurysm, pipeline embolization device, posterior circulation, salvage therapy, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, RC321-571
الوصف: BackgroundThe Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial primarily demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the implantation of multiple pipeline embolization devices (multi-PEDs) for large/giant intracranial aneurysms. However, no study has focused on when, why, or how to apply multi-PEDs.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the indications and strategies of using multi-PEDs for complex intracranial aneurysms.MethodsPatients who had been treated with two or more PEDs were included in the post-market multicenter registry study from 2014 to 2019, across 14 centers in China. Indications, strategies, perioperative safety, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes comprehensively, and the O’Kelly–Marotta (OKM) grading scale was used to evaluate aneurysm healing results.ResultsA total of 55 intracranial aneurysms were treated with multi-PEDs. There were 20 fusiform aneurysms with a large range, 25 large/giant saccular aneurysms, six aneurysms with failed treatment, and four aneurysms with greatly varied diameters of the parent artery. The strategies included telescope techniques in 40 patients and overlap techniques in 15 patients. In total, 120 stents were deployed in 55 patients. The operation styles included 25 patients (55.6%) with two PEDs, 21 patients (38.2%) with two PEDs combined with coiling, four patients (7.3%) with three PEDs, four patients (7.3%) with three PEDs combined with coiling, and one patient (1.8%) with four PEDs. Angiography revealed OKM D in two, OKM C in seven, and OKM A and B in 46 cases after surgery. During the perioperative period, eight patients developed neurological dysfunction, three of whom died. A total of thirty-four patients were followed up with digital subtraction angiography for 2–45 (8.2 ± 8.0) months. Angiography revealed OKM D in 26, OKM C in five, and OKM B in three. At the last follow-up, the mRS score was 0–1 in 52 patients.ConclusionThe treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms with multi-PEDs is safe and effective. The implantation of multi-PEDs could be considered for large-scale fusiform aneurysms, large/giant saccular aneurysms with a jet-sign, salvage of failed PED treatments, and in cases where the diameter of the parent artery varies greatly.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1663-4365
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2022.905224/full; https://doaj.org/toc/1663-4365
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.905224
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/81812530a10d48ad83e69c49521c1066
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.81812530a10d48ad83e69c49521c1066
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:16634365
DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2022.905224