Academic Journal

Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
المؤلفون: Florian Moik, Florian Posch, Christoph Zielinski, Ingrid Pabinger, Cihan Ay
المصدر: Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol 4, Iss 4, Pp 550-561 (2020)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs
مصطلحات موضوعية: anticoagulants, factor Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparin, neoplasms, venous thromboembolism, venous thrombosis, Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, RC633-647.5
الوصف: Abstract Background Low‐molecular‐weight‐heparins (LMWHs) have been established for the treatment of cancer‐associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with LMWHs. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWHs and update the evidence for treatment of VTE in cancer. Methods Biomedical databases were screened for RCTs evaluating DOACs for cancer‐associated VTE. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes of this meta‐analysis were recurrent VTE and major bleeding at 6 months. Secondary outcomes comprised clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), major gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary bleeding, mortality, fatal bleeding/pulmonary embolism, and treatment discontinuation rate. We performed prespecified subgroup analyses. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by the Mantel‐Haenszel method within a random‐effect model. Results We screened 759 articles and included 4 RCTs (n = 2894). DOACs significantly reduced recurrent VTEs compared to LMWHs (5.2% vs 8.2%; RR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43‐0.91]), but were associated with a nonsignificant increase in major bleedings (4.3% vs 3.3%; RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.83‐2.08]) and a significant increase in CRNMB (10.4% vs 6.4%; RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.19‐2.28]). Mortality risks were comparable between groups (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83‐1.18]). Preterm treatment discontinuation was less common with DOACs (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81‐0.96]). Major bleeding was more frequent in patients with GI cancer treated with DOACs (RR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.08‐4.88]). Conclusion In patients with cancer‐associated VTE, DOACs are more effective in preventing recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. However, risk of bleeding is increased with DOACs, especially in patients with GI cancer.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2475-0379
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2475-0379
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12359
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/78bbbcc5423a49988e6eb275bfd1e4d9
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.78bbbcc5423a49988e6eb275bfd1e4d9
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:24750379
DOI:10.1002/rth2.12359