التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Comparing the performance of two social risk screening tools in a vulnerable subpopulation |
| المؤلفون: |
Cara C Lewis, Robert Wellman, Salene M W Jones, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Ella Thompson, Alphonse Derus, Andrea Paolino, John Steiner, Emilia H De Marchis, Laura M Gottlieb, Adam L Sharp |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Vol 9, Iss 9, Pp 5026-5034 (2020) |
| بيانات النشر: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: |
2020 |
| المجموعة: |
LCC:Medicine |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
psychometric, social determinants of health, social risk, validity, Medicine |
| الوصف: |
Background: Research shows the profound impact of social factors on health, lead many healths systems to incorporate social risk screening. To help healthcare systems select among various screening tools we compared two tools, the Your Current Life Situation (YCLS) and the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Screening tools, on key psychometric properties. Method: Kaiser Permanente Southern California subsidized exchange members (n = 1008) were randomly invited to complete a survey containing either the YCLS or the AHC tool, as well as other measures related to care experience and health. Healthcare use was measured through the electronic health record. Agreement between the AHC and YCLS was assessed using adjusted kappas for six domains (food – worry, food – pay, insecure housing, housing quality, transportation, utilities). To assess predictive validity, items on the AHC and YCLS were compared to self-rated health and receipt of a flu shot. Results: Responders (n = 450) and non-responders (n = 558) significantly differed on sex, language, and depression (P < 0.05) but not anxiety, race/ethnicity, or healthcare use. Agreement between the AHC and YCLS tools was substantial on all items (kappas > 0.60) except for housing quality (kappa 0.52). Four out of six screening questions on the AHC tool and four out of seven on the YCLS tool were associated with self-rated health (P < 0.03). No social needs were associated with flu shot receipt except utilities on the AHC tool (P = 0.028). Conclusion: In this sample, the AHC and YCLS tools are similar in their ability to screen for social risks. Differences observed likely stem from the timeframe and wording of the questions, which can be used to guide selection in healthcare systems. |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article |
| وصف الملف: |
electronic resource |
| اللغة: |
English |
| تدمد: |
2249-4863 |
| Relation: |
http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=9;spage=5026;epage=5034;aulast=Lewis; https://doaj.org/toc/2249-4863 |
| DOI: |
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_650_20 |
| URL الوصول: |
https://doaj.org/article/4e72a29b87d740f6a466ea5d9e432b76 |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsdoj.4e72a29b87d740f6a466ea5d9e432b76 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder