Academic Journal

Social barriers in accessing care by clients who returned to HIV care after transient loss to follow-up

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Social barriers in accessing care by clients who returned to HIV care after transient loss to follow-up
المؤلفون: Babatunde Adelekan, Nifarta Andrew, Iboro Nta, Asabe Gomwalk, Nicaise Ndembi, Charles Mensah, Patrick Dakum, Ahmad Aliyu
المصدر: AIDS Research and Therapy, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2019)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
المجموعة: LCC:Immunologic diseases. Allergy
مصطلحات موضوعية: Loss to follow-up (LTFU), Anti-retroviral therapy (ART), Social barriers, HIV, PLHIV, Nigeria, Immunologic diseases. Allergy, RC581-607
الوصف: Abstract Background People living with HIV (PLHIV) constantly need to address social issues such as the cost of accessing care, stigma, and lack of social support which impacts on their level of adherence to clinic visits or antiretroviral treatment leading to adverse health outcomes. This study examined the social barriers in accessing care by clients who returned to care after transient loss to follow-up. Methods This study was a cross-sectional survey of PLHIV from 99 US CDC PEPFAR-supported HIV clinics located in 10 of Nigeria’s 36 states and Federal Capital Territory, who were momentarily lost to follow-up but returned to care after tracking. Demographic and social factors at bivariate and multivariate level were analyzed to determine the predictors of difficulty in accessing HIV clinics. Results Of the 7483 clients tracked, 1386 (18.5%) were confirmed to be in care, 2846 (38.2%) were lost to follow-up (LTFU), 562 (7.5%) returned to care, 843 (11.2%) discontinued care, 827 (11.1%) transferred out to other facilities for care, 514 (6.8%) had died while 505 (6.7%) could not be reached by phone or located at their addresses. 438 out of the 562 (78%) returnee PLHIV gave consent and participated in the study. 216 out of the 438 (50%) clients who returned to care were transiently lost to follow-up because they had difficulty accessing their HIV clinic. Also, 126/438 (29%) of returnee PLHIV were previously lost to follow-up. Difficult access to a HIV clinic was significantly influenced by prior LTFU (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.3–4.8], p = 0.008), history of being stigmatized (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1–3.8], p = 0.02), lack of social or financial support (OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.3–6.0], p = 0.01) and perceived in-adequate healthcare workers support (OR 3.8 [95% CI 1.2–11.2], p = 0.02). Age (p = 0.218) and gender (p = 0.771) were not significant determinants of difficult access to an HIV clinic. Conclusion Stigma, lack of support and prior loss to follow-up event are essential factors affecting retention in care. Social constructs such as home-based visits, community-based care services, transportation subsidies, and robust strong social systems should be built into HIV service delivery models to improve retention in care of people on HIV treatment. The authors advocate for further studies on how differentiated care models impact on retention of patients in care.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1742-6405
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12981-019-0231-5; https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405
DOI: 10.1186/s12981-019-0231-5
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/d1e9b2db4de740cc864c58b7b87d5607
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.1e9b2db4de740cc864c58b7b87d5607
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:17426405
DOI:10.1186/s12981-019-0231-5