Academic Journal

Real-World Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA-1273 Versus BNT162b2 on Inpatient and Medically Attended COVID-19 Among Immunocompromised US Adults

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Real-World Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA-1273 Versus BNT162b2 on Inpatient and Medically Attended COVID-19 Among Immunocompromised US Adults
المؤلفون: Tianyu Sun, Linwei Li, Katherine E. Mues, Mihaela V. Georgieva, Brenna Kirk, James A. Mansi, Nicolas Van de Velde, Ekkehard C. Beck
المصدر: Infectious Diseases and Therapy, Vol 13, Iss 8, Pp 1771-1787 (2024)
بيانات النشر: Adis, Springer Healthcare, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Infectious and parasitic diseases
مصطلحات موضوعية: COVID-19, Immunocompromised, mRNA-1273, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccine effectiveness, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216
الوصف: Abstract Introduction Recent data have shown elevated infection rates in several subpopulations at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19, including immunocompromised (IC) individuals. Previous research suggests that IC persons have reduced risks of hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19 with two doses of mRNA-1273 (SpikeVax; Moderna) compared to two doses of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty; Pfizer/BioNTech). The main objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare real-world effectiveness of third doses of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 at multiple time points on occurrence of COVID-19 hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19 among IC adults in the United States (US). Methods This retrospective, observational comparative effectiveness study identified patients from the US HealthVerity database from December 11, 2020, through August 31, 2022. Medically attended SARS-CoV-2 infections and hospitalizations were assessed following a three-dose mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 regimen. Inverse probability weighting was applied to balance baseline confounders between vaccine groups. Relative risk (RR) and risk difference were calculated for subgroup and sensitivity analyses using a non-parametric method. Results In propensity score-adjusted analyses, receiving mRNA-1273 vs. BNT162b2 as third dose was associated with 32.4% (relative risk 0.676; 95% confidence interval 0.506–0.887), 29.3% (0.707; 0.573–0.858), and 23.4% (0.766; 0.626–0.927) lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalization after 90, 180, and 270 days, respectively. Corresponding reductions in medically attended COVID-19 were 8.4% (0.916; 0.860–0.976), 6.4% (0.936; 0.895–0.978), and 2.4% (0.976; 0.935–1.017), respectively. Conclusions Our findings suggest a third dose of mRNA-1273 is more effective than a third dose of BNT162b2 in preventing COVID-19 hospitalization and breakthrough medically attended COVID-19 among IC adults in the US.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2193-8229
2193-6382
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2193-8229; https://doaj.org/toc/2193-6382
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-01005-1
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/135bc195a5a842ecb560c5f0ed540e50
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.135bc195a5a842ecb560c5f0ed540e50
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:21938229
21936382
DOI:10.1007/s40121-024-01005-1