Academic Journal

Can a shoe‐mounted IMU identify the effects of orthotics in ways comparable to gait laboratory measurements?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Can a shoe‐mounted IMU identify the effects of orthotics in ways comparable to gait laboratory measurements?
المؤلفون: Max Lewin, Carina Price, Christopher Nester
المصدر: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2023)
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
مصطلحات موضوعية: Orthotics, Footwear, Wearables, Sensitivity, Validation, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, RC925-935
الوصف: Abstract Background Footwear and orthotic research has traditionally been conducted within laboratories. With increasing prevalence of wearable sensors for foot and ankle biomechanics measurement, transitioning experiments into the real‐world is realistic. However wearable systems must effectively detect the direction and magnitude of response to interventions to be considered for future usage. Methods RunScribe IMU was used simultaneously with motion capture, accelerometers, and force plates during straight‐line walking. Three orthotics (A, B, C) were used to change lower limb biomechanics from a control (SHOE) including: Ground reaction force (GRF) loading rate (A), pronation excursion (A and B), maximum pronation velocity (A and B), and impact shock (C) to test whether RunScribe detected effects consistent with laboratory measurements. Sensitivity was evaluated by assessing: 1. Significant differences (t‐test) and effect sizes (Cohen's d) between measurement systems for the same orthotic, 2. Statistical significance (t‐test and ANOVA) and effect size (Cohen's d & f) for orthotic effect across measurement systems 3. Direction of orthotic effect across measurement systems. Results GRF loading rate (SHOE: p = 0.138 d = 0.403, A: p = 0.541 d = 0.165), impact shock (SHOE: p = 0.177 d = 0.405, C: p = 0.668 d = 0.132), pronation excursion (A: p = 0.623 d = 0.10, B: p = 0.986 d = 0.00) did not significantly differ between measurement systems with low effect size. Significant differences and high effect sizes existed between systems in the control condition for pronation excursion (p = 0.005 d = 0.68), and all conditions for pronation velocity (SHOE: p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1757-1146
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146
DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00654-8
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/0f3f62c8101e48b29b2b3f7b3955678f
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.0f3f62c8101e48b29b2b3f7b3955678f
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:17571146
DOI:10.1186/s13047-023-00654-8