التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves functional outcomes, complications, and revisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| المؤلفون: |
Alessandro Bensa, Alessandro Sangiorgio, Luca Deabate, Andrea Illuminati, Benedetta Pompa, Giuseppe Filardo |
| المصدر: |
Bone & Joint Open, Vol 5, Iss 5, Pp 374-384 (2024) |
| بيانات النشر: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2024. |
| سنة النشر: |
2024 |
| المجموعة: |
LCC:Orthopedic surgery |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
knee, unicompartmental arthroplasty, uka, robotic surgery, robotic knee replacement, outcomes, functional outcomes, robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (uka), radiological outcomes, forgotten joint score (fjs), knee society score, clinical outcomes, bmi, randomized controlled trials, medial ukas, Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811 |
| الوصف: |
Aims: Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA) has been proposed as an approach to improve the results of the conventional manual UKA (C-UKA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the studies comparing R-UKA and C-UKA in terms of clinical outcomes, radiological results, operating time, complications, and revisions. Methods: The literature search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science) on 20 February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were comparative studies, written in the English language, with no time limitations, on the comparison of R-UKA and C-UKA. The quality of each article was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Quality. Results: Among the 3,669 articles retrieved, 21 studies on 19 series of patients were included. A total of 3,074 patients (59.5% female and 40.5% male; mean age 65.2 years (SD 3.9); mean BMI 27.4 kg/m2 (SD 2.2)) were analyzed. R-UKA obtained a superior Knee Society Score improvement compared to C-UKA (mean difference (MD) 4.9; p < 0.001) and better Forgotten Joint Score postoperative values (MD 5.5; p = 0.032). The analysis of radiological outcomes did not find a statistically significant difference between the two approaches. R-UKA showed longer operating time (MD 15.6; p < 0.001), but reduced complication and revision rates compared to C-UKA (5.2% vs 10.1% and 4.1% vs 7.2%, respectively). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that the robotic approach for UKA provided a significant improvement in functional outcomes compared to the conventional manual technique. R-UKA showed similar radiological results and longer operating time, but reduced complication and revision rates compared to C-UKA. Overall, R-UKA seems to provide relevant benefits over C-UKA in the management of patients undergoing UKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):374–384. |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article |
| وصف الملف: |
electronic resource |
| اللغة: |
English |
| تدمد: |
2633-1462 |
| Relation: |
https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 |
| DOI: |
10.1302/2633-1462.55.BJO-2024-0030.R1 |
| URL الوصول: |
https://doaj.org/article/018dcd30a01646f48620268130aa6c1b |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsdoj.018dcd30a01646f48620268130aa6c1b |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder