Academic Journal

When Do Governments Support Common Goods for Health? Four Cases on Surveillance, Traffic Congestion, Road Safety, and Air Pollution

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: When Do Governments Support Common Goods for Health? Four Cases on Surveillance, Traffic Congestion, Road Safety, and Air Pollution
المؤلفون: Jesse B. Bump, Sumithra Krishnamurthy Reddiar, Agnès Soucat
المصدر: Health Systems & Reform, Vol 5, Iss 4, Pp 293-306 (2019)
بيانات النشر: Taylor & Francis Group
سنة النشر: 2019
المجموعة: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
مصطلحات موضوعية: collective action, common goods, global health history, government failure, public health, Medicine (General), R5-920, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Common goods such as air, water, climate, and other resources shared by all humanity are under increasing pressure from growing population and advancing globalization of the world economy. Safeguarding these resources is generally considered a government responsibility, as common goods are vulnerable to market failure. However, governments do not always fulfill this role, and face many challenges in doing so. This observation—that governments only sometimes address common goods problems—informs the central question of this paper: when do governments act in support of common goods? We structure our inquiry using a framework derived from three theories of agenda setting, emphasizing problem perception, the role of actors and collective action patterns, strategies and policies, and catalyzing circumstances. We used a poll of experts to identify important common goods for health: disease surveillance, environmental protection, and accountability. We then chose four historical cases for analysis: the establishment of the Epidemic Intelligence Service in the US, transport planning in London, road safety in Argentina, and air quality control in urban India. Our analysis of the collective evidence of these cases suggests that decisions to advance government action on common goods require a concisely articulated problem, a well-defined strategy for addressing the problem, and leadership backed by at least a few important groups willing to cooperate. Our cases reveal a variety of collective action patterns, suggesting that there are many routes to success. We consider that the timing of an intervention in support of common goods depends on favorable circumstances, which can include a catalyzing event but does not necessarily require one.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2328-8604
2328-8620
Relation: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1661212; https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8604; https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8620; https://doaj.org/article/cee3aa952bbe47719adef0f27cdf6fbc
DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1661212
الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1661212
https://doaj.org/article/cee3aa952bbe47719adef0f27cdf6fbc
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.F1274F7D
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
تدمد:23288604
23288620
DOI:10.1080/23288604.2019.1661212