التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: |
This figure shows the weighted percentage of members of each party who voted for congressional candidates of each party. |
المؤلفون: |
Claudia Kann, Daniel Ebanks, Jacob Morrier, R. Michael Alvarez |
سنة النشر: |
2024 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Biotechnology, Science Policy, Mental Health, Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, unexpected policy shock, struggling national economy, seemingly unpredictable outcome, nationally representative sample, low approval rate, incumbent president ’, analysis particularly seeks, specific issues could, persuadable voters decided, div >< p, 2020 presidential election, comparative analysis, wade <, underwhelming performance, understand whether, traditionally considered, survey conducted, supreme court, sudden shift, study delves, significant impact, roe v, results beyond, republican wave, predictions pointed |
الوصف: |
From this figure it is clear that party cohesion was strong—most people voted with their party. This supports the idea that most of the interesting variation will come from those who identify as Independents. Independents as a group make up about half as many individuals as Democrats or Republicans, indicating that they could be the swing vote in the election. Democrats were significantly more loyal to their party than Republicans. |
نوع الوثيقة: |
still image |
اللغة: |
unknown |
Relation: |
https://figshare.com/articles/figure/This_figure_shows_the_weighted_percentage_of_members_of_each_party_who_voted_for_congressional_candidates_of_each_party_/25032332 |
DOI: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0294047.g002 |
الاتاحة: |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294047.g002 https://figshare.com/articles/figure/This_figure_shows_the_weighted_percentage_of_members_of_each_party_who_voted_for_congressional_candidates_of_each_party_/25032332 |
Rights: |
CC BY 4.0 |
رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.F031B0AD |
قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |