Academic Journal
Effectiveness evaluation of passive resistive element placement on a fault ride‐through enhancement in a DFIG‐based wind energy conversion system
| العنوان: | Effectiveness evaluation of passive resistive element placement on a fault ride‐through enhancement in a DFIG‐based wind energy conversion system |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Sahoo, Subhendu Sekhar, Tripathi, Prashant Mani, Chatterjee, Kalyan |
| المساهمون: | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India |
| المصدر: | Wind Energy ; volume 23, issue 3, page 825-848 ; ISSN 1095-4244 1099-1824 |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| المجموعة: | Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref) |
| الوصف: | Over the last few decades, doubly fed induction generators (DFIG) have become one of the most successful and preferred types of wind energy generators (WEG). The DFIG has the advantages of a wide range of speed operations, a high efficiency, and partial rated converters. However, direct coupling of the stator with the grid makes the system more prone to grid disturbances. The consequences of grid disturbances, such as a rotor overcurrent, stator overcurrent, electromagnetic torque oscillations, and direct current (DC) link overvoltage, are the predominant considerations that affect the rotor circuit, stator circuit, mechanical components, and DC‐link capacitor of the DFIG, respectively. These uncertainties affect the operation of the generator and may lead to the generator to be shutdown. In this paper, a novel position for the placement of a passive resistive element (PRE) is illustrated. This position of the PRE placement is compared with all other possible locations for the PRE. The different locations for PRE placement are the stator side, rotor side, across the DC‐link capacitor, and between the rotor side converter (RSC) and grid side converter (GSC). This paper aims to determine a cost‐effective solution among all possible locations of the PRE placement. The novel position of the PRE, ie, between the RSC and GSC, is the best position among the other possible locations of the PRE, when the performance, cost, and loss are taken into consideration. The effectiveness of the PRE is further compared with the resistive‐type superconducting fault current limiter (R‐SFCL). The PRE performs better and has a lower cost than the R‐SFCL. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1002/we.2461 |
| الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/we.2461 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fwe.2461 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/we.2461 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/we.2461 |
| Rights: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.E4012C4 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1002/we.2461 |
|---|