Academic Journal

„Człowiek totalny” versus „człowiek integralny”. Przyczynek do Karola Marksa i Iwana Kiriejewskiego rozważań o człowieku ; “Complete individual” versus “Integral personality”. Preliminaries for considerations on human nature by Karl Marx and Ivan Kireevsky ; “Total man” versus “integral man”. Contribution to Karol Marks and Ivan Kiryevski for human deliberations; “Complete individual” versus “Integral personality”. Preliminaries for considerations on human nature by Karl Marx and Ivan Kireevsky

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: „Człowiek totalny” versus „człowiek integralny”. Przyczynek do Karola Marksa i Iwana Kiriejewskiego rozważań o człowieku ; “Complete individual” versus “Integral personality”. Preliminaries for considerations on human nature by Karl Marx and Ivan Kireevsky ; “Total man” versus “integral man”. Contribution to Karol Marks and Ivan Kiryevski for human deliberations; “Complete individual” versus “Integral personality”. Preliminaries for considerations on human nature by Karl Marx and Ivan Kireevsky
المؤلفون: Kroczak, Justyna
المساهمون: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski
بيانات النشر: Uniwersytet Łódzki
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Kiriejewski, słowianofilstwo, Marks o człowieku, wspólnota wiejska, wspólnota pierwotna, integralność, osobowość integralna, Kireevsky, Slavophilia, Marks on human being, commune, primitive communism, integrality, integral personality, hist, phil
الوصف: The aim of this paper is to compare views on human nature as held by Karl Marx and Ivan Kireevsky. Despite the fact that Marx and Kireevsky expounded two totally different philosophical world views (such as slavophilia and dialectical materialism), both can be described as socialists: one scientific, the other utopian or religious one. In this regard, it turns out that some elements of their concepts of a human being are rather common. Both of them thought that man achieves his “completeness” or “integrality” in community, not by exclusively private efforts. Kireevsky envisioned his community as an Orthodox commune, while Marx his as a classless society. Analysis shows that both anthropological concepts were more reflecting of their utopian visions than any working social model.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: unknown
Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33771
الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33771
Rights: undefined
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.E3F0CCAF
قاعدة البيانات: BASE