Academic Journal
The Reception and Influence of Plato’s Thought. A Path to Otloh of St. Emmeram, 11th C. ; La recepción e influencia del pensamiento de Platón. Un sendero hasta Otloh de San Emeramo, s. XI
| العنوان: | The Reception and Influence of Plato’s Thought. A Path to Otloh of St. Emmeram, 11th C. ; La recepción e influencia del pensamiento de Platón. Un sendero hasta Otloh de San Emeramo, s. XI |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Violante, Susana |
| المصدر: | Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2024): Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 31/2 (2024); 35-53 ; Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval; Vol. 31 Núm. 2 (2024): Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 31/2 (2024); 35-53 ; 2530-7878 ; 1133-0902 ; 10.21071/refime.v31i2 |
| بيانات النشر: | UCOPress |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | Universidad de Córdoba: Servicio de Revistas Electrónicas |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Otloh de San Emeramo, Pseudo-Dionisio, Juan Escoto Eriúgena, Dialéctica, Verdad 'opinable', Logos, Otloh of St. Emmeram, Pseudo-Dionysius, John Scotus Eriugena, Dialectics, ‘Opinable’ Truth |
| الوصف: | Otloh of St. Emmeram (Regensburg 1010-1070) gained access to Plato’s thought through the writings of the (neo)Platonists. He read the Pythagoreans, Roman poets such as Virgil, Horace, Lucan, Terence, Juvenal, Phaedrus, Marcianus Capella and, above all, he was an admirer and avid reader of Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite – he pretended to transfer his mortal remains to Saint Emmeram, because there he was supposed to have preached – whom he approached through the translation made by John Scotus Eriugena. These thinkers allow him to distinguish the ‘mobile’ sense of dialectics, as an exercise of ascent and descent to the intelligible realm in order to understand the sensible. He applies dialectics as an art to approach the truth whose movement we will see exemplified in the chaining of reasoning, the analysis of its contradictions and the attempt of their refutation to elucidate them and to accept doubt as something human, which cannot be escaped.To this end, we will explore fragments and interpretations in which one can glimpse that “ideas” have different ontological statuses, for which reason his arguments have the character of what is possible, accessible, opinable, approximate, without reaching absolute truth. ; Otloh de San Emeramo (Regensburg 1010-1070) accede al pensamiento de Platón a través de los escritos de los (neo)platónicos. Lee a los pitagóricos, a poetas romanos como Virgilio, Horacio, Lucano, Terencio, Juvenal, Fedro, Marciano Capella y, sobre todo, fue admirador y estudioso de Pseudo-Dionisio Areopagita –pretendió trasladar sus restos a San Emeramo, porque allí habría predicado–, a quien aborda a través de la traducción que realizara Juan Escoto Eriúgena. Estos pensadores le permiten distinguir el sentido “móvil” de la dialéctica, en tanto ejercicio de ascenso y descenso al ámbito inteligible para comprender el sensible. Aplica la dialéctica como un arte para aproximarse a la verdad cuyo movimiento veremos ejemplificado en el encadenamiento de razonamientos, el análisis de sus contradicciones y el ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | Spanish; Castilian |
| Relation: | https://journals.uco.es/refime/article/view/16707/15854; https://journals.uco.es/refime/article/view/16707 |
| DOI: | 10.21071/refime.v31i2.16707 |
| الاتاحة: | https://journals.uco.es/refime/article/view/16707 https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v31i2.16707 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.E3D58317 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.21071/refime.v31i2.16707 |
|---|