| الوصف: |
This article presents an action research study which purpose was to determine the extent to which the Reciprocal Teaching model (RT), proposed by Palincscar and Brown (1984), impacts tenth grader’s English writing skills. The research work included: (1) A diagnostic stage to determine the participant’s initial difficulties in regards to their writing skills; (2) An action stage that consisted of the implementation of some workshops based on the RT model and focused on reading strategies, namely predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. (3) An evaluation stage where key findings indicated the usefulness of RT for building confidence in the students and for developing their writing skills as they were able to expand their vocabulary spectrum, reduce syntax errors, and improve the content, organization and punctuation of their writing. Findings also suggest that assessing writing performance through portfolios is useful to enhance the school curriculum because students engaged in their own learning and participated actively in their learning process. Keywords: curriculum, Reciprocal Teaching Model, reading strategies, portfolios, writing. ; Este artículo presenta un estudio de Investigación-Acción cuyo propósito fue determinar en qué medida el modelo de Enseñanza Recíproca (ER), propuesto por Palincscar y Brown (1984), afecta las habilidades de escritura en inglés del décimo grado. Este trabajo de investigación incluyó: (1) Una etapa de diagnóstico para determinar las dificultades iniciales del participante con respecto a sus habilidades de escritura; (2) Una etapa de acción que consistió en la implementación de algunos talleres basados en el modelo ER y se enfocó en cuatro estrategias de lectura como la predicción, clarificación, cuestionamiento y resumen. (3) una etapa de evaluación donde los principales hallazgos indicaron la utilidad de ER para generar confianza en los participantes y desarrollar sus habilidades de escritura, ya que pudieron ampliar su espectro de vocabulario, reducir los errores de ... |
| Relation: |
https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/801/619; Anderson, R., Spiro, R., & Montague, W. (1977). Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.; Bae, J. (2011). Teaching Process Writing for Intermediate/Advanced Learners in South Korea. Wisconsin, United States: University of Wisconsin-River Falls.; Brown, H.D. (1994) Teaching byprinciples: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Up-per Saddle, N.J.: Prentice Hall; Burns, A. (1999)Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press; Cozby, P. C. (1997). Methods in behavioral research (6th ed.).Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.; Durukan, E. (2017, My 15). Effects of cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC) technique on reading-writing skills. Retrieved from Educational Research and Reviews: http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR; Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Brown University.; Gregg, L. W., & Steinberg, E. R. (1980). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.; Hacker, D. J. (1998). Metacognition: Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C.; Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; Hansen, J. (1981). The Effects of Inference Training and Practice on Young Children"s Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(3), 391-417. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from the Jstor database.; Harmer, J (2007). How to Teach English. Pearson Education Limited: Essex, England; Harris, R. (2000). Rethinking Writing. London: Athlone Press.; Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and applications. Oxford: Pergamon.; Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Portsmouth: Heinemann.; Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning, Review of Research in Education.; Lewin, K. (2006). Origins of Action Research. Educational Action Research.; Lubliner, S. (2004). Help for Struggling Upper-Grade Elementary Readers. The Reading Teacher, 57(5), p430-438, 9p. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from the ERICEBSCO database.; Moya, S. S. and J. M. O'Malley. (1994), A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students , 13, pp. 13-36.; Murcia, M. C. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or or Foreign Language (3rd. Edition). Copyright by Heinle, a dicvision of Thomson learning Inc.; Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.; Oczuks, L. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.; Palincsar, A. (1986). Reciprocal teaching. In Teaching reading as thinking. In O. Brook, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.; Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 117-175.; Pearson, P., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction (pp. 815-860). White Plains, NY: . In M. K. R. Barr, Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 815-860). Longman Publishing.; Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology In Language Teaching. An anthology of current Practice. Cambridge : Cambridge university press.; Saddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004). The writing Rubric. In B. Saddler, & H. Andrade, Educational Leadership (pp. 48-52). Alenxandria, United States: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Devepment.; Schools, T. B. (2017, 06 1). The wriitng process. Retrieved from The writing process: https://www.bcps.org/offices/lis/writing/secondary/process.html; Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.; Williams, J. (2010). Taking on the role of questioner: Revisiting reciprocal teaching. The Reading Teacher, 278-281.; https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/801 |