التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Nikolai Gogol and Vissarion Belinsky: View Above Stereotypes ; Н.В. Гоголь и В.Г. Белинский: поверх стереотипов |
| المؤلفون: |
Nizhnikov S.A. |
| المصدر: |
Электронное научное издание Альманах Пространство и Время |
| بيانات النشر: |
Автономная некоммерческая организация Научно-издательский Центр "Пространство и Время" |
| سنة النشر: |
2020 |
| المجموعة: |
NORA (National aggregator of open repositories of Russian universities) / Национальный агрегатор открытых репозиториев российских университетов |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Николай Гоголь, Виссарион Белинский, аскеза, творчество, "натуральная школа", соборность, западники, славянофилы, либералы, консерваторы, Nikolai Gogol, Vissarion Belinsky, asceticism, creativity, 'natural school', sobornost, Westerners, slavophiles, liberals, conservatives |
| الوصف: |
The stereotyping of relations between Westernizers and Slavophiles, template view on representatives of both of them and those close to both of these circles, calling names like ‘revolutionary democrat’ and ‘reactionary’ are characteristic not only of Soviet history of Russian literature and public thought, but also of their foreign researchers. The most outstanding personalities in the history of Russian public and literary thought of the mid-19th century were Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852) and Vissarion Belinsky (1811-1848), known not only for their writings, but also for their correspondence with each other; they are more than anyone else who suffered from stereotyped approach to their ideas and personalities. In particular, among the contemporaries of Gogol and Belinsky, their correspondence of 1847 widely covered in the Russian press (including the Russian abroad) generated a lot of clichés. These clichés dominated in the Soviet school and circulate in modern Russian cultural-philosophical community. In my short paper, I aspire to consider well known dispute of 1847 between Belinsky and Gogol and both of their personalities using textual and philosophical hermeneutics analysis of both their correspondence and memoirs of their contemporaries. Thanks to Belinsky’s ability, ones reckon Gogol in so-called ‘natural school’ that is a kind of realism, while already Russian philosopher Vasily Rozanov (1856-1919) stressed that Gogol’s characters are fictitious and formal. However, Gogol is still seen as a critic of social reality. In this incorrect assessment, both revolutionaries who used Gogol's "criticism" to justify their violent and immoral activities, and liberals who seek to belittle and blacken Russian history and reality in every way, are of the same mind. Accordingly, the fact that Gogol burned the second part of his "Dead Souls" is often explained by his ideological cowardice and decline of his creativity, while the writer was a victim of his own mental illness and spiritual hardness of his spiritual mentor. ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: |
Russian |
| Relation: |
https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-9490-2018-11051; https://openrepository.ru/article?id=244680 |
| الاتاحة: |
https://openrepository.ru/article?id=244680 |
| Rights: |
open access |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.DD03326B |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |