Academic Journal
Good Scientific Practice and Academic Reviews
| العنوان: | Good Scientific Practice and Academic Reviews |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Hörnle, Tatjana |
| بيانات النشر: | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| المجموعة: | Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität: edoc-Server |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law, Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law, Public International Law, International Economics, 340 Recht, ddc:340 |
| الوصف: | Academic reviews (hereinafter “reviews”) are an integral part of legal journals. While their purpose and usefulness are at times disputed, all sub-disciplines of legal studies nevertheless argue in equal measure that a lack of substantial academic exchange by way of reviews would result in the impoverishment of scientific discourse. In German criminal law scholarship, two recent cases have sparked debate about whether certain rules should govern the publication of such reviews. The following remarks are intended to provide a thought-provoking impulse on the matter. ; Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (2) ; Peer Reviewed |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1046-8374 1572-9850 |
| Relation: | http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/27262; urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/27262-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/26564 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10609-021-09424-2 |
| DOI: | 10.18452/26564 |
| الاتاحة: | http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/27262 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/27262-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-021-09424-2 https://doi.org/10.18452/26564 |
| Rights: | (CC BY 4.0) Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.C805206F |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| تدمد: | 10468374 15729850 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10609-021-09424-2 |