Data_Sheet_1_Individual vs. Group Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.doc

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Data_Sheet_1_Individual vs. Group Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.doc
المؤلفون: Tingting Guo (101831), Jing Su (23377), Jiayi Hu (8072753), Marianne Aalberg (9612833), Yinglin Zhu (11584495), Teng Teng (3129972), Xinyu Zhou (736229)
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: Smithsonian Institution: Digital Repository
مصطلحات موضوعية: Psychiatry (incl. Psychotherapy), anxiety disorder, individual cognitive behavior therapy, group cognitive behavior therapy, children, adolescent, meta-analysis
الوصف: Background: Anxiety disorder is the most prevalent mental disorder in children and adolescents. However, evidence for efficacy and acceptability between individual cognitive behavior therapy (I-CBT) and group cognitive behavior therapy (G-CBT) in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents remains unclear. Methods: Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and LILACS) were searched from inception to October 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing I-CBT with G-CBT for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents were included. The primary outcomes were efficacy (mean change in anxiety symptom scores) at post-treatment and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation). The secondary outcome was remission at post-treatment. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine whether the result would be influenced by age, number of treatment sessions, parental involvement, male/female sex, and number of participants. Results: Nine studies were selected in this meta-analysis. The pooled analyses indicated no significant difference between I-CBT and G-CBT for efficacy at post-treatment [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.37 to 0.09], acceptability [odds ratio (OR), 1.30; 95% CI, 0.61–2.77], and remission at post-treatment (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79–1.66). In the subgroup analysis of age, I-CBT was significantly more effective than G-CBT in adolescents at post-treatment (SMD, −0.77; 95% CI, −1.51 to −0.02), but not in children (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.20). However, the findings were not materially different from those of the efficacy subgroup analysis of number of treatment sessions, parental involvement, male/female sex, and number of participants. Conclusions: Based on those current evidence, I-CBT was shown to be more beneficial than G-CBT for anxiety disorders in adolescents, but not in children. However, further well-designed clinical studies should be performed to confirm these findings. Systematic Review ...
نوع الوثيقة: dataset
اللغة: unknown
Relation: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Individual_vs_Group_Cognitive_Behavior_Therapy_for_Anxiety_Disorder_in_Children_and_Adolescents_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Randomized_Controlled_Trials_doc/16835857
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.674267.s001
الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.674267.s001
Rights: CC BY 4.0
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.BEED8FAD
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.674267.s001