Academic Journal
Oral mouthwashes for asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic adults with COVID-19 and salivary viral load: a randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label clinical trial
العنوان: | Oral mouthwashes for asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic adults with COVID-19 and salivary viral load: a randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label clinical trial |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Onozuka, Daisuke, Takatera, Satoko, Matsuo, Hiroo, Yoshida, Hisao, Hamaguchi, Shigeto, Yamamoto, Shungo, Sada, Ryuichi Minoda, Suzuki, Koichiro, Konishi, Keiji, Kutsuna, Satoshi |
المساهمون: | Earth Corporation, Tokyo, Japan |
المصدر: | BMC Oral Health ; volume 24, issue 1 ; ISSN 1472-6831 |
بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
سنة النشر: | 2024 |
الوصف: | Background Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that the effect of using cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthwashes on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load in COVID-19 patients has been inconsistent. Additionally, no clinical study has investigated the effectiveness of on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide mouthwash against COVID-19. Methods We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label clinical trial to assess for any effects of using mouthwash on the salivary SARS-CoV-2 viral load among asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic adult COVID-19-positive patients. Patients were randomized to receive either 20 mL of 0.05% CPC, 10 mL of 0.01% on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide, or 20 mL of placebo mouthwash (purified water) in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the cycle threshold (Ct) values employed for SARS-CoV-2 salivary viral load estimation. We used linear mixed-effects models to assess for any effect of the mouthwashes on SARS-CoV-2 salivary viral load. Results Of a total of 96 eligible participants enrolled from November 7, 2022, to January 19, 2023, 90 were accepted for the primary analysis. The use of 0.05% CPC mouthwash was not shown to be superior to placebo in change from baseline salivary Ct value at 30 min (difference vs. placebo, 0.640; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.425 to 2.706; P = 0.543); 2 h (difference vs. placebo, 1.158; 95% CI, -0.797 to 3.112; P = 0.246); 4 h (difference vs. placebo, 1.283; 95% CI, -0.719 to 3.285; P = 0.209); 10 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.304; 95% CI, -1.777 to 2.385; P = 0.775); or 24 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.782; 95% CI, -1.195 to 2.759; P = 0.438). The use of 0.01% on-demand aqueous chlorine dioxide mouthwash was also not shown to be superior to placebo in change from baseline salivary Ct value at 30 min (difference vs. placebo, 0.905; 95% CI, -1.079 to 2.888; P = 0.371); 2 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.709; 95% CI, -1.275 to 2.693; P = 0.483); 4 h (difference vs. placebo, 0.220; 95% CI, -1.787 to 2.226; ... |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
اللغة: | English |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1.pdf |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1/fulltext.html |
الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1/fulltext.html |
Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.BE7B6A7D |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12903-024-04246-1 |
---|