التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
How the Choice of Distance Measure Influences the Detection of Prior-Data Conflict |
| المؤلفون: |
Lek, K.M., van de Schoot, R. |
| المساهمون: |
Methodology and statistics for the behavioural and social sciences, Leerstoel Schoot |
| سنة النشر: |
2019 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
prior-data conflict, distance measure, Kullback-Leibler, data agreement criterion |
| الوصف: |
Thepresentpapercontraststworelatedcriteriafortheevaluationofprior-dataconflict: the Data Agreement Criterion (DAC; Bousquet, 2008) and the criterion of Nott et al. (2016). One aspect that these criteria have in common is that they depend on a distance measure, of which dozens are available, but so far, only the Kullback-Leibler has been used. We describe and compare both criteria to determine whether a different choice of distance measure might impact the results. By means of a simulation study, we investigate how the choice of a specific distance measure influences the detection of prior-data conflict. The DAC seems more susceptible to the choice of distance measure, while the criterion of Nott et al. seems to lead to reasonably comparable conclusions of prior-data conflict, regardless of the distance measure choice. We conclude with some practical suggestions for the user of the DAC and the criterion of Nott et al. |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: |
image/pdf |
| اللغة: |
English |
| تدمد: |
1099-4300 |
| Relation: |
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/389822 |
| الاتاحة: |
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/389822 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.BB1F0A87 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |
Full Text Finder