Academic Journal
Decision Aid for Cigarette Smokers Scheduled for Elective Surgery
العنوان: | Decision Aid for Cigarette Smokers Scheduled for Elective Surgery |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Warner, David O., LeBlanc, Annie, Kadimpati, Sandeep, Vickers, Kristin S., Shi, Yu, Montori, Victor M. |
المصدر: | Anesthesiology ; volume 123, issue 1, page 18-28 ; ISSN 0003-3022 |
بيانات النشر: | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) |
سنة النشر: | 2015 |
الوصف: | Abstract In a randomized trial of 130 surgical patients, use of a decision aid consisting of laminated cards with pros and cons of continuing smoking, attempting temporary abstinence, or attempting to quit smoking improved measures of decisional quality but did not change perioperative tobacco use behavior. Background: Decision aids can increase patient involvement in decision-making about health care. The study goal was to develop and test a decision aid for use by clinicians in discussion options for changing smoking behavior before and after elective surgery. Methods: In formative work, a decision aid was designed to facilitate patient–clinician discussion regarding three options: continue smoking, attempt a period of temporary abstinence, and attempt to quit smoking for good. A randomized, two-group pilot study was then conducted in smokers evaluated in preparation for elective surgery in a preoperative clinic to test the hypothesis that the decision aid would improve measures of decisional quality compared with usual care. Results: The final decision aid consisted of three laminated cards. The front of each card included a colorful graphic describing each choice; the reverse including two to three pros and cons for each decision, a simple graphic illustrating the effects of smoking on the body, and a motivational phrase. In the randomized trial of 130 patients, the decision aid significantly ( P < 0.05) improved measures of decisional quality and patient involvement in decision making (Cohen’s d effect sizes of 0.76 and 1.20 for the Decisional Conflict Scale and Observing PatienT involvement In decisiON-making scale, respectively). However, the decision aid did not affect any aspect of perioperative smoking behavior, including the distribution of or adherence to choices. Conclusions: Although the use of a decision aid to facilitate clinician–patient discussions regarding tobacco use around the time of surgery substantially improved measures of decisional quality, it alone did not change ... |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
اللغة: | English |
DOI: | 10.1097/aln.0000000000000704 |
الاتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000704 http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/123/1/18/373068/20150700_0-00015.pdf http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?volume=123%26page=18 |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.B1F89982 |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
DOI: | 10.1097/aln.0000000000000704 |
---|