التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
O ŠIRENJU PREOBILJA (DUBLETNOSTI) U GENITIVU MNOŽINE IMENICA e‑SKLONIDBE S VIŠESUGLASNIČKIM ZAVRŠETKOM OSNOVE ; ON THE SPREAD OF OVERABUNDANCE IN THE GENITIVE PLURAL OF CROATIAN e‑DECLENSION NOUNS WITH A STEM ENDING IN A CONSONANT CLUSTER |
| المؤلفون: |
Polančec, Jurica, Bošnjak Botica, Tomislava |
| المصدر: |
FLUMINENSIA : Journal for philological research; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2024): Fluminensia; 211–243 ; FLUMINENSIA : časopis za filološka istraživanja; Svezak 36 Br. 1 (2024): Fluminensia; 211–243 ; 1848-9680 ; 0353-4642 |
| بيانات النشر: |
Odsjek za kroatistiku Filozofskoga fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci Sveučilišna avenija 4, HR-51000 Rijeka |
| سنة النشر: |
2024 |
| المجموعة: |
University of Zagreb (SRCE): OJS / Sveučilišni računski centar Sveučilišta u Zagrebu |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
preobilje (dubletnost), genitiv množine, imenice ženskoga roda, štokavsko narječje, kajkavsko narječje |
| الوصف: |
Rad prikazuje širenje preobilja (dubletnosti) u genitivu množine imenica ženskoga roda e‑sklonidbe s višesuglasničkim završetkom osnove u hrvatskom jeziku. Te se imenice u genitivu množine pojavljuju u dvama ili trima oblicima (žalba: žalbā/žalbī, pogreška: pogrešākā/pogreškā/pogreškī). Ukratko se opisuje pojava nastavka ‑ā i epenteza koja ga prati te naknadni nestanak epenteze. Najveći je dio rada posvećen postanku i širenju novoga nastavka ‑ī. Pokazuje se da je u ranim fazama razvitka standardnoga jezika (18. i 19. st.) taj nastavak već raširen, ali samo u sjevernom dijelu novoštokavskoga teritorija. U južnim je govorima odsutan i takvo se stanje održalo praktički do danas. Razmatra se dominacija nastavka ‑ī u suvremenom jeziku te se uzroci za to stanje dijelom pronalaze i u raširenosti takva nastavka u kajkavskom narječju. ; The paper sketches the origins and spread of overabundance in the genitive plural of Croatian e‑declension nouns with a stem ending in a consonant cluster. These nouns in the genitive plural have either two or three forms (žalba ‘complaint’ has two: žalbā/žalbī; pogreška ‘mistake’ has three: pogrešākā/pogreškā/pogreškī). First, the paper addresses the emergence of the ā ending and the accompanying epenthesis, as well as the subsequent disappearance of the epenthesis. The central part of the paper discusses the emergence and spread of the new ending ‑ī. It is shown that in the early stages of the development of the Croatian standard language (18th and 19th centuries), this ending was already widespread, but only in the northern part of the territory where South Slavic Štokavian dialects are spoken. In the southern Štokavian dialects, it is absent, and this state of affairs is preserved almost to this day. The reasons for the increasing dominance of the suffix ‑ī in the modern language are also considered, and it is argued that this state of affairs is partly due to the prevalence of the same suffix in the South Slavic Kajkavian dialect group. |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: |
application/pdf |
| اللغة: |
Croatian |
| Relation: |
https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/fluminensia/article/view/32212/16353; https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/fluminensia/article/view/32212 |
| الاتاحة: |
https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/fluminensia/article/view/32212 |
| Rights: |
Copyright (c) 2024 FLUMINENSIA : Journal for philological research |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.B069188 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |