Academic Journal

Is an isolated positive sonication fluid culture in revision arthroplasties clinically relevant?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Is an isolated positive sonication fluid culture in revision arthroplasties clinically relevant?
المؤلفون: Rondaan, Christien, Maso, Alessandra, Birlutiu, Rares Mircea, Fernandez Sampedro, Marta, Soriano, Alex, Diaz de Brito, Vicens, Gómez Junyent, Joan, Del Toro, Maria Dolores, Hofstaetter, Jochen Gerhard, Salles, Mauro José, Esteban, Jaime, Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan, Horcajada, Juan Pablo, Hamburger, Flávio Guinsburg, Salas Venero, Carlos, Pietro, Cimatti
المصدر: ESCMID Study Group on Implant Associated Infections (ESGIAI) , Rondaan , C , Maso , A , Birlutiu , R M , Fernandez Sampedro , M , Soriano , A , Diaz de Brito , V , Gómez Junyent , J , Del Toro , M D , Hofstaetter , J G , Salles , M J , Esteban , J , Wouthuyzen-Bakker , M , Horcajada , J P , Hamburger , F G , Salas Venero , C & Pietro , C 2023 , ' Is an isolated positive sonication fluid culture in revision arthroplasties clinically relevant? ....
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: University of Groningen research database
مصطلحات موضوعية: Culture, EBJIS, Periprosthetic joint infection, Single positive culture, Sonication
الوصف: Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of an isolated positive sonication fluid culture (SFC) in patients who underwent revision surgery of a prosthetic joint. We hypothesized that cases with a positive SFC have a higher rate of infection during follow-up compared with controls with a negative SFC. Methods: This retrospective multicentre observational study was performed within the European Study Group of Implant-Associated Infections. All patients who underwent revision surgery of a prosthetic joint between 2013 and 2019 and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. Patients with positive tissue cultures or synovial fluid cultures were excluded from the study. Results: A total of 95 cases (positive SFC) and 201 controls (negative SFC) were included. Infection during follow-up occurred in 12 of 95 cases (12.6%) versus 14 of 201 controls (7.0%) (p = 0.125). In all, 79.8% of cases were with treated with antibiotics (76/95). Of the non-treated cases, 89% (17/19) had a positive SFC with a low virulent microorganism. When solely analysing patients who were not treated with antibiotics, 16% of the cases (3/19) had an infection during follow-up versus 5% of the controls (9/173) (p = 0.08). Discussion: Although not statistically significant, infections were almost twice as frequent in patients with an isolated positive SFC. These findings require further exploration in larger trials and to conclude about the potential benefit of antibiotic treatment in these cases.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.018
الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/11370/f138f570-4709-4e30-9a4f-c5ce975c3079
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/f138f570-4709-4e30-9a4f-c5ce975c3079
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.018
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/864177016/PIIS1198743X23003452.pdf
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168514656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.AA667EFB
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.018