Academic Journal
Comparison of Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides Versus Mulligan Natural Apophyseal Glides in Mechanical Neck Pain
| العنوان: | Comparison of Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides Versus Mulligan Natural Apophyseal Glides in Mechanical Neck Pain |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Waqas, Shoaib, Shah, Syed Haider Ali, Zafar, Usmara, Akhtar, Muhammad Fiaz |
| المصدر: | Annals of King Edward Medical University; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2017): AKEMU ; 2079-0694 ; 2079-7192 ; 10.21649/akemu.v23i3 |
| بيانات النشر: | King Edward Medical University |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| المجموعة: | Annals of King Edward Medical University |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGS), Neck strengthening exercises, natural apophyseal glides (NAGS) and short wave dia-thermy |
| الوصف: | Background: Mechanical neck pain is a discomfort that rises from posterior aspect of skull and travelstowards the lower cervical spine and shoulders. In this discomfort, vertebral arrangements are disturbedand the joints of cervical spine and ribs fails to perform the proper biomechanical movements resulting indecreased mobility, which creates pain. In present study, Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides(SNAGS) and natural apophyseal glides (NAGS) were applied in mechanical neck pain subjects to reducethe immobility and pain.Methodology: A randomized clinical trial with simple random sampling by random number table was conducted. A sample size of 50 (n=50) subjects were taken from physiotherapy department NationalHospital Lahore, who fulfilled the selection criteria and were distributed into two equal groups of twentyfiveeach. The researchers took a prior informed consent from all participants before any inspection or examination. The base line treatment remained same for both groups, which was neck range of motion,strengthening exercises and short wave diathermy (SWD). Group A received Mulligan SNAGS whilegroup B received NAGS. Treatment frequency was three times per week for two weeks(1). Subjects were assessed at the start of the management and at the completion of second week. Whole data were collectedusing Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) to asses change in pain intensity and demographic data byconstructed questionnaire. The data were analysed using SPSS version 22.Results: The calculated mean value of pain on NPRS and standard deviation for both groups A & B beforetreatment was 3.72 ± 0.61373 and 3.84 ± 0.47258 respectively, while after 6 sessions the calculated mean value of pain on NPRS and standard deviation for group A & B was 1.28 ± 0.45826 and 1.92 ± 0.81240respectively. The calculated “t” value was -3.431 and “p” value 0.001, which was an illustration of statistically significant difference between the mean values of NPRS pre and post treatment in terms of pain reduction.Conclusion: ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| Relation: | http://annalskemu.org/journal/index.php/annals/article/view/2007/1505; http://annalskemu.org/journal/index.php/annals/article/view/2007 |
| DOI: | 10.21649/akemu.v23i3.2007 |
| الاتاحة: | http://annalskemu.org/journal/index.php/annals/article/view/2007 https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v23i3.2007 |
| Rights: | Copyright (c) 2017 Annals of King Edward Medical University |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.AA411AF0 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.21649/akemu.v23i3.2007 |
|---|