Academic Journal

Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography
المؤلفون: Chan, Hsun-Liang, Brooks, Sharon L., Fu, Jia-Hui, Yeh, Chu-Yuan, Rudek, Ivan, Wang, Hom-Lay
المساهمون: School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Department of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Eng. A.B. Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
بيانات النشر: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
سنة النشر: 2011
المجموعة: University of Michigan: Deep Blue
مصطلحات موضوعية: Anatomy, Complication, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Dental Implant, Edentulous, Mandible, Dentistry, Health Sciences
الوصف: To study the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity in the edentulous first molar region from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the mandibles.Qualified cross-sectional images in mandibular first molar edentulous region taken from CBCT were selected. The mandible morphology 2 mm above the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) was classified into the convex (C), parallel (P) and undercut (U) type, based on the presence of lingual concavity and the shape of alveolar ridge. The prevalence of each group was determined. Subsequently, the lingual concavity characters, including the depth, the angulation and the vertical location were determined by the measurements of selected anatomic landmarks.One hundred and three subjects (mean age 51 with a range of 23.7–70.4 years) were studied. The U type was the most prevalent, accounting for 66% of the study population. The mean undercut depth and angulation at the level 2 mm above IAC were on average 2.4 mm and 57.7°. The mean vertical distances from the most prominent point (P) of the lingual concavity to the cemento-enamel junction of second premolar and the inferior border of the mandible were 11.7 and 14.9 mm, respectively.The anatomic location and the degree of the lingual concavity presented in this article add more information in implant treatment planning in the mandibular first molar edentulous region. To cite this article: Chan H-L, Brooks SL, Fu J-H, Yeh C-Y, Rudek I, Wang H-L. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Impl. Res . 22 , 2011; 201–206. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x ; Peer Reviewed ; http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79062/1/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x.pdf
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: 658364 bytes; 3106 bytes; application/pdf; text/plain
اللغة: unknown
تدمد: 0905-7161
1600-0501
Relation: Chan, Hsun-Liang; Brooks, Sharon L.; Fu, Jia-Hui; Yeh, Chu-Yuan; Rudek, Ivan; Wang, Hom-Lay; (2011). "Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography." Clinical Oral Implants Research 22(2): 201-206.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79062; Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x
الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79062
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x
Rights: IndexNoFollow
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.AA33ACE0
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
تدمد:09057161
16000501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x