Academic Journal
A Comparative Study of Desarda versus Lichtenstein Techniques for Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia Repair in Hospitals
| العنوان: | A Comparative Study of Desarda versus Lichtenstein Techniques for Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia Repair in Hospitals |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Vishal Shekhar, Shailendra Kumar, Chandra Mohan Sinha |
| المصدر: | International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 16(8), 1882-1885, (2024-08-30) |
| بيانات النشر: | International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | Zenodo |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Inguinal Hernia, Desarda Repair, Lichtenstein Repair, Postoperative Pain, Recurrence |
| الوصف: | Background: Inguinal hernia repair is commonly performed using mesh (Lichtenstein) and non-mesh (Desarda) techniques. While Lichtenstein is widely adopted, it carries risks of chronic pain and infection, prompting interest in the Desarda method as a potential alternative. Aim: To compare Desarda and Lichtenstein techniques in terms of operative time, pain, complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction in uncomplicated inguinal hernia cases. Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 100 patients randomized into Desarda and Lichtenstein groups at JLNMCH, Bhagalpur. Data on operative time, postoperative pain, complications, recurrence at 6 months, and satisfaction were collected. SPSS version 23.0 was used for analysis, with significance at p < 0.05. Results: Desarda repair had a shorter operative time (45.8 vs. 60.3 min, p < 0.001), less postoperative pain (VAS 3.2 vs. 5.4, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs. 2.3 days, p < 0.001). Chronic pain was lower in Desarda (2% vs. 14%, p = 0.03), with no significant difference in recurrence rates (p = 0.56). Patient satisfaction was higher in Desarda repair. Conclusion: Desarda repair offers advantages over Lichtenstein in reducing operative time, postoperative pain, and recovery duration, with higher patient satisfaction and comparable recurrence rates. ; Background: Inguinal hernia repair is commonly performed using mesh (Lichtenstein) and non-mesh (Desarda) techniques. While Lichtenstein is widely adopted, it carries risks of chronic pain and infection, prompting interest in the Desarda method as a potential alternative. Aim: To compare Desarda and Lichtenstein techniques in terms of operative time, pain, complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction in uncomplicated inguinal hernia cases. Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 100 patients randomized into Desarda and Lichtenstein groups at JLNMCH, Bhagalpur. Data on operative time, postoperative pain, complications, recurrence at 6 months, and satisfaction were ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| Relation: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14263576; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14263577; oai:zenodo.org:14263577; http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue8,Article311.pdf |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.14263577 |
| الاتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14263577 http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue8,Article311.pdf |
| Rights: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.A640918D |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.14263577 |
|---|