Academic Journal

Is the Presence of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion Relevant for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Is the Presence of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion Relevant for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse?
المؤلفون: García-Mejido, José Antonio, Martín-Martinez, Alicia, García-Jimenez, Rocío, González-Diaz, Enrique, Núñez-Matas, María José, Fernández Palacín, Fernando, Carballo-Rastrilla, Sonia, Fernández-Fernández, Camino, Sainz Bueno, José Antonio
المساهمون: Estadística e Investigación Operativa
المصدر: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine - 2024, Vol. 43, n.2 pp. 265-272
بيانات النشر: John Wiley and Sons Ltd
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: RODIN - Repositorio de Objetos de Docencia e Investigación de la Universidad de Cádiz
مصطلحات موضوعية: 3D transperineal ultrasound, pelvic floor, pelvic organ prolapse, uterine prolapse
الوصف: Objective: To determine if the addition of the assessment of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion to the measurement of the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus distance between rest and with the Valsalva maneuver could increase the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound for uterine prolapse (UP). Methods: This multicenter, observational and prospective study included 145 patients. Ultrasound assessment was performed, establishing the diagnosis of UP as a difference between the pubic-uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver ≥15 mm (standard technique), while LAM avulsion was defined as an abnormal LAM insertion in three central slices using multislice ultrasound. A binary multivariate logistic regression model was made using nonautomated methods to predict surgical UP (general population, premenopausal, and postmenopausal patients), including the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver as well as LAM avulsion. Results: A total of 143 patients completed the study. The addition of LAM avulsion criteria to the standard dynamic distance-based protocol for the diagnosis of UP resulted in a higher sensitivity for the general population (79.7 vs 68.1%) as well as for premenopausal (89.3 vs 79.9%) and postmenopausal patients (76 vs 66.1%). In contrast, the standard technique showed a higher specificity than the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion for the general population (89.2 vs 74.3%) and premenopausal women (91.7 vs 63.2%). For postmenopausal patients, the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion had a higher sensitivity (76 vs 66.1%) and specificity (91.7 vs 86.8%) than the ultrasound diagnosis of UP. Conclusion: The implementation of the assessment of LAM avulsion in the ultrasound diagnosis of UP is useful in postmenopausal patients, increasing sensitivity and specificity relative to the ultrasound assessment based only on the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1550-9613
0278-4297
Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/32285
DOI: 10.1002/JUM.16356
الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/32285
https://doi.org/10.1002/JUM.16356
Rights: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ ; open access
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.A322026C
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
تدمد:15509613
02784297
DOI:10.1002/JUM.16356