Academic Journal
Palliative antecolic isoperistaltic gastrojejunostomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic approaches
| العنوان: | Palliative antecolic isoperistaltic gastrojejunostomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic approaches |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | NAVARRA, Giuseppe, MUSOLINO, CINZIA DOMENICA, DE MARCO, MARIA LUISA, BARTOLOTTA, Marcello, VENNERI A. |
| المساهمون: | Navarra, Giuseppe, Musolino, CINZIA DOMENICA, Venneri, A., DE MARCO, MARIA LUISA, Bartolotta, Marcello |
| سنة النشر: | 2006 |
| المجموعة: | Università degli Studi di Messina: IRIS |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | gastric outlet obstruction, laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy, open gastrojejunostomy, palliative antecolic isoperistaltic gastrojejunostomy |
| الوصف: | Gastric outlet obstruction is a common, often preterminal, event for patients with inoperable neoplasms of the distal stomach, duodenum, and biliopancreatic area. It can be surgically managed by open or laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy. This study aimed to compare the results of open and laparoscopic palliative gastrojejunostomy for patients with gastric outlet obstruction resulting from inoperable neoplasms. A total of 24 patients were randomized prospectively to undergo laparoscopic (12 patients) or open (12 patients) palliative laterolateral antecolic isoperistaltic gastrojejunostomy. All the procedures were completed as planned. The mean duration of surgery was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.75). The mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly less after laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) (p = 0.0001). Time to oral solid food intake was longer after open gastrojejunostomy (OGJ) (p = 0.04). Two patients in the OGJ group experienced postoperative delayed gastric empting, whereas no patients in the LGJ group experienced such a complication (p = 0.04). The mean postoperative stay was shorter in the LGJ group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.65). No readmissions were registered after a minimum follow-up period of 2 months. The findings show that LGJ is a safe, feasible, and effective alternative to OGJ. However, because the current data involved only a small number of patients, large studies still are required for further evaluation of the this operation's effectiveness |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | ELETTRONICO |
| اللغة: | English |
| Relation: | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/17063298; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000242972200006; volume:20; issue:12; firstpage:1831; lastpage:1834; numberofpages:4; journal:SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY; http://hdl.handle.net/11570/1889779; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-33845218341 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-005-0454-5 |
| الاتاحة: | http://hdl.handle.net/11570/1889779 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0454-5 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.98FE9B72 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-005-0454-5 |
|---|