Academic Journal
Quality of life in patients with a subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
العنوان: | Quality of life in patients with a subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Jagosz, Marta, Jędrzejczyk-Patej, Ewa, Kowalska, Wiktoria, Mazurek, Michał, Warwas, Szymon, Wiktor, Dominika, Sokal, Adam, Kowalski, Oskar, Lenarczyk, Radosław, Średniawa, Beata, Kalarus, Zbigniew |
المصدر: | Kardiologia Polska; Vol 80, No 6 (2022); 679-684 ; Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal); Vol 80, No 6 (2022); 679-684 |
بيانات النشر: | Polish Cardiac Society |
سنة النشر: | 2022 |
المجموعة: | Via Medica Journals |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | quality of life, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, subcutaneous cardioverter-de-fibrillator, prognosis |
الوصف: | Background: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) are well-accepted life-saving devices for treating potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia, but little is known about quality of life (QoL) in patients with S-ICD and ICD. Aims: Our study aimed to compare QoL in patients with S-ICD and ICD.Methods: All consecutive patients who had S-ICD implanted between October 2015 and September 2021 were included in the study. A cohort of transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) patients was matched to S-ICD subjects by sex, age, indications for the device, and type of prevention. All patients were requested to fulfill two standardized questionnaires to assess QoL: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) 6 months after device implantation. Results: Patients with S-ICD (n = 49) and TV-ICD (n = 49) did not differ regarding baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences between S-ICD and TV-ICD subgroup, both for mental and physical QoL assessed in SF-36 and MLHFQ (all P = NS). The median MLHFQ total score was 24 (9–41) for S-ICD and 28 (14–43) for TV-ICD (P = 0.83). The median total score for the SF-36 questionnaire was 62.5 (29–86) vs. 59 (38–77) for S-ICD and TV-ICD, respectively (P = 0.78). Conclusions: Quality of life after device implantation does not differ significantly between the groups of patients with subcutaneous and conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
اللغة: | English |
Relation: | https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska/article/view/KP.a2022.0110 |
DOI: | 10.33963/KP.a2022.0110 |
الاتاحة: | https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska/article/view/KP.a2022.0110 https://doi.org/10.33963/KP.a2022.0110 |
Rights: | The copyright to the submitted manuscript is held my the Author, who grants the Polish Cardiac Society a nonexclusive licence to use, reproduce, and distribute the work, including for commercial purposes. Kardiol Pol in an open access journal applying the Creative Commonst Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivates 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), allowing third parties to download articles and share them with others, provided the original work is properly cited, not changed in any way, distributed under the same licence, and used for noncommercial purposes only. For commercial use, please contact the journal office: kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl. ; Przesyłając manuskrypt wraz z ilustracjami i tabelami, automatycznie i nieodpłatnie przenosi (przenoszą) na Polskie Towarzystwo Kardiologiczne wszelkie prawa autorskie do wydawania oraz rozpowszechniania nadesłanych materiałów we wszystkich znanych formach i na wszystkich znanych polach eksploatacji, bez ograniczeń terytorialnych językowych pod warunkiem, że materiały te zostaną zaakceptowane do publikacji. |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.9230236D |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
DOI: | 10.33963/KP.a2022.0110 |
---|