Academic Journal

Hedgehog inhibitors beyond clinical complete response in basal cell carcinoma: should I stop or should I go?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Hedgehog inhibitors beyond clinical complete response in basal cell carcinoma: should I stop or should I go?
المؤلفون: Alfieri S, Romanò R, Marceglia S, De Giorgi V, Peris K, Sollena P, Piccerillo A, Moro R, Gualdi G, Ascierto PA, Palla M, Paone M, Eibenschutz L, Spagnolo F, Queirolo P, Filippini DM, Cavalieri S, Resteghini C, Bergamini C, Manocchio A, Licitra L, Bossi P
المساهمون: S. Alfieri, R. Romanò, S. Marceglia, V. De Giorgi, K. Peri, P. Sollena, A. Piccerillo, R. Moro, G. Gualdi, P. Ascierto, M. Palla, M. Paone, L. Eibenschutz, F. Spagnolo, P. Queirolo, D. Filippini, S. Cavalieri, C. Resteghini, C. Bergamini, A. Manocchio, L. Licitra, P. Bossi
بيانات النشر: Oxford University Press
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: The University of Milan: Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (AIR)
مصطلحات موضوعية: basal cell carcinoma, beyond complete response, hedgehog inhibitor, maintenance therapy, sonidegib, vismodegib, Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica, Settore MEDS-09/A - Oncologia medica
الوصف: Introduction: In advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the issue of whether Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) should be stopped or not after clinical complete response (cCR) achievement remains an unmet clinical need.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across 7 Italian dermato-oncology units including patients with BCC who continued vismodegib after cCR between 2012 and 2019. We assessed the relationship between the duration of vismodegib intake (days to cCR [DTCR], days to stop after cCR [DTS], total treatment days [TTD]), and disease-free survival (DFS). Reasons to stop vismodegib were (R1) toxicity and (R2) disease recurrence. The relationship between DTCR, DTS, TTD, and DFS in the whole population and in R1 subgroup was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient (P < .05) and Bayesian statistics (BF10).Results: Sixty-eight BCC patients with a median (m) age of 75.5 years (39-100) were included. Most patients were male (N = 43, 63%), without Gorlin syndrome (N = 56, 82%) and with head and neck area as primary site (N = 51, 75%). After cCR, out of 68 patients, 90% (N = 61/68) discontinued vismodegib: 82% (N = 50/61) due to toxicity (R1), and 18% (N = 11/61) due to recurrence (R2). Conversely, 10% (N = 7/68) continued vismodegib until last follow-up. In the whole population (N = 68), cCR was achieved with a mDTCR of 180.50 days. DFS showed a significant correlation with DTS (P < .01, BF10 = 39.2) and TTD (P < .01, BF10 = 35566), while it was not correlated to DTCR (BF10 < 0.1). The analysis of R1 subgroup (N = 50) confirmed these results. DFS correlated with DTS in all recurrent patients (N = 38, r = 0.44, P < .01) and in the recurrent patients who stopped vismodegib for toxicity (N = 26, r = 0.665, P < .01). DFS was longer when vismodegib was maintained for >2 months after cCR (mDFS > 2 months, N = 54 vs. <= 2 months, N = 14: 470 vs. 175 d, P < .01).Conclusions: Our retrospective results suggest that HHIs should be continued after cCR to improve DFS ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/38127280; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:001128438800001; volume:29; issue:5; firstpage:e699; lastpage:e707; numberofpages:9; journal:THE ONCOLOGIST; https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1039362
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad319
الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1039362
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad319
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.8BB0168E
قاعدة البيانات: BASE