Academic Journal

649 The Quality of Survey Research in Burn Care: A Systematic Review

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: 649 The Quality of Survey Research in Burn Care: A Systematic Review
المؤلفون: Anderson, Dana, Fordyce, Erin, Vrouwe, Sebastian Q
المصدر: Journal of Burn Care & Research ; volume 42, issue Supplement_1, page S182-S182 ; ISSN 1559-047X 1559-0488
بيانات النشر: Oxford University Press (OUP)
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Rehabilitation, Emergency Medicine, Surgery
الوصف: Introduction Burn care is a relatively small field with contributions from many healthcare disciplines. Further, the practice of burn care varies considerably from center to center and between regions. Given these factors, survey studies are frequently used to better understand practice variations, establish guidelines, and direct future research questions. If survey research is poorly designed or reported, it limits the ability to form meaningful conclusions. Given the prevalence of clinician surveys published in burn care, this study aims to evaluate its quality and to determine which approaches lead to a more successful survey. Methods A systematic review was performed by two independent reviewers using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the dates January 1, 2000 to March 19, 2020. Articles were included if they were published in English and surveyed providers on a topic related to burn care. Surveys of patients, those that evaluated an intervention or included other research designs were excluded. Data related to survey content, methodology, and quality was extracted independently by two reviewers. Results The search identified 7351 non-duplicate citations, of which 247 underwent full text review, and 144 met inclusion criteria. The number of published surveys increased by an average of 21% annually over the study period (P< 0.001). The majority of surveys originated in the United States (40%), United Kingdom (19%) and Canada (7%) and were either national (47%) or international (37%) in scope. The most common themes were education/training/workforce (21%), resuscitation/critical care (17%) and wound care (14%). Burn surgeons/physicians (45%) were the most frequently surveyed population, but all disciplines were represented. The majority of surveys were electronic (51%) and sampled all members of a defined group (72%). Few studies reported the use of reminders (29%) or incentives (2%) to improve survey completion. In terms of quality, the majority did not report any survey ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab032.299
الاتاحة: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irab032.299
http://academic.oup.com/jbcr/article-pdf/42/Supplement_1/S182/36837126/irab032.299.pdf
Rights: https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.89C5C094
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irab032.299