Academic Journal
Premier et Second âges du Bronze, ou comment périodiser l’âge du Bronze en France ?
| العنوان: | Premier et Second âges du Bronze, ou comment périodiser l’âge du Bronze en France ? |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Milcent, Pierre-Yves |
| المساهمون: | Travaux et recherches archéologiques sur les cultures, les espaces et les sociétés (TRACES), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (MCC)-Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives (Inrap)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT) |
| المصدر: | ISSN: 2257-1248. |
| بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD Association pour la Promotion des Recherches sur l'Âge du Bronze |
| سنة النشر: | 2022 |
| المجموعة: | Université Toulouse 2 - Jean Jaurès: HAL |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Protohistory, First Bronze age, Second Bronze age, Campaniform, historical dynamics, Protohistoire, Premier âge du Bronze, Second âge du Bronze, Campaniforme, Périodisation, Historiographie, Dynamiques historiques, Jean-Jacques Hatt, [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory |
| الوصف: | International audience ; Bronze Age chronologies used in France are based on periodization or, in other words, on identifyingsuccessive periods. Distinguishing these periods is equivalent to separating them from one another, andcarving out sections in the time continuum. Dividing time into tranches is not neutral since it highlightsdiscontinuities and major transitions between periods that would otherwise be characterized by continuousor progressive changes. To periodize is therefore to propose a historical interpretation.To periodize the Bronze Age, French protohistorians commonly use the ternary system established byJean-Jacques Hatt between 1954 and 1962. Th is was at a time when workable documentation was limited.Th is system, despite numerous and complex modifications, no longer corresponds to an objective reality,but mainly possesses a conventional value. Based on a synthesis of data from various documentary fi elds,we are proposing a new periodization, subdivided in two, for the Bronze Age in the northern two thirds ofFrance. A fi rst Bronze Age, long and rather homogeneous by its very progressive development, delineatesitself from the XXVth to the mid XVth century B.C. It is succeeded by a second Bronze Age with a moreuneven but generally increasing evolution until the crisis of around 800 B.C.Th e extension of the Bronze Age, by including the Bell-Beaker period and its division in two, aims mostly tobetter report knowledge acquired recently. It’s also an invitation to look differently at the Bronze Age by freeingourselves from chronological frameworks which have become progressively more conventional and binding. ; Les chronologies de l’âge du Bronze utilisées en France reposent sur des périodisations, c’est-à-dire surl’identification de périodes successives. Distinguer ces périodes revient à les séparer les unes des autres, et àdécouper en tranches un continuum, celui du temps. Découper le temps n’est pas neutre, car cela revientà mettre en exergue des discontinuités, des transitions majeures, entre ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | French |
| Relation: | hal-03850043; https://hal.science/hal-03850043 |
| الاتاحة: | https://hal.science/hal-03850043 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.7F8A35F4 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| الوصف غير متاح. |