Academic Journal
La Constitution, vecteur de 'politique mémorielle'
| العنوان: | La Constitution, vecteur de 'politique mémorielle' |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Pierre-Caps, Stephane |
| المساهمون: | Institut de Recherches sur l'Evolution de la Nation Et de l'Etat (IRENEE), Université de Lorraine (UL) |
| المصدر: | ISSN: 1290-9653 ; EISSN: 2496-4514 ; Civitas Europa. |
| بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD Institut de recherches sur l'évolution de la Nation et de l'État IRENEE (Université de Lorraine) |
| سنة النشر: | 2022 |
| المجموعة: | Université de Lorraine: HAL |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Libéralisme constitutionnel, Instrumentalisation de l'histoire, Fédération de Russie, [SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science |
| الوصف: | International audience ; Constitutional liberalism, despite its declared neutrality towards political actors, has always paid the greatest attention to memory and history. But this interest has deeply moved over time. The incorporation of a memorial policy into the Constitution was initially motivated by the need to build a national narrative intentend to legitimize the newer states. It was then a question of inserting into the long time of history the existence of nations still constantly evolving, a task granted to constitutional preambles. The construction, real or fantasized, of a national past then appeared as a mirror allowing the nation to protect itself into the future. Subsequently, because of the elimination of the great ideologies and in order to legitimize the power of the rulers, they anacted a memorial legislation, sometimes penalized by instrumentalizing history in a preventive approach, that of a reading normative of the past. It was about opposing any interpretation of memory that might contradict the liberal constitutional order and the principle of equality, by restoring their owing to the « damned of history » and by associating commemoration with the worship of symbols. This memorial constitutionnalism, which can be described as « historicist », nevertheless left the clear field to the work of the historian by guaranteeing freedom of expression. But, recently, constitutional politics of memory has taken on a « historicide » dimension, like that observed in the Russian Federation. By including in its Constitution, the defense of « historical truth », the Russian political power has undertaken to build an official historical narrative, with a nationalist and identity vocation, of which it intends to keep the monopoly. There follows a systematic repression of historians and a denigration of their work, constituting « crimes against history ». The official writing of the past, typical of illiberalism, replaces the lack of prospects. This leads to a deep change in constitutional law : procedural ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | French |
| Relation: | hal-04001977; https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-04001977 |
| DOI: | 10.3917/civit.048.0065 |
| الاتاحة: | https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-04001977 https://doi.org/10.3917/civit.048.0065 |
| Rights: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.70A74323 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.3917/civit.048.0065 |
|---|