Data_Sheet_1_Comparing Remote Sensing and Field-Based Approaches to Estimate Ladder Fuels and Predict Wildfire Burn Severity.zip

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Data_Sheet_1_Comparing Remote Sensing and Field-Based Approaches to Estimate Ladder Fuels and Predict Wildfire Burn Severity.zip
المؤلفون: Brieanne Forbes, Sean Reilly, Matthew Clark, Ryan Ferrell, Allison Kelly, Paris Krause, Corbin Matley, Michael O’Neil, Michelle Villasenor, Mathias Disney, Phil Wilkes, Lisa Patrick Bentley
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: Frontiers: Figshare
مصطلحات موضوعية: Agroforestry, Forestry Biomass and Bioproducts, Forestry Fire Management, Forestry Management and Environment, Forestry Pests, Health and Diseases, ladder fuels, terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), handheld-mobile laser scanner (HMLS), unoccupied aerial system (UAS), airborne laser scanner (ALS), Structure from Motion (SfM), wildfire burn severity
الوصف: While fire is an important ecological process, wildfire size and severity have increased as a result of climate change, historical fire suppression, and lack of adequate fuels management. Ladder fuels, which bridge the gap between the surface and canopy leading to more severe canopy fires, can inform management to reduce wildfire risk. Here, we compared remote sensing and field-based approaches to estimate ladder fuel density. We also determined if densities from different approaches could predict wildfire burn severity (Landsat-based Relativized delta Normalized Burn Ratio; RdNBR). Ladder fuel densities at 1-m strata and 4-m bins (1–4 m and 1–8 m) were collected remotely using a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), a handheld-mobile laser scanner (HMLS), an unoccupied aerial system (UAS) with a multispectral camera and Structure from Motion (SfM) processing (UAS-SfM), and an airborne laser scanner (ALS) in 35 plots in oak woodlands in Sonoma County, California, United States prior to natural wildfires. Ladder fuels were also measured in the same plots using a photo banner. Linear relationships among ladder fuel densities estimated at broad strata (1–4 m, 1–8 m) were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation (r). From 1 to 4 m, most densities were significantly correlated across approaches. From 1 to 8 m, TLS densities were significantly correlated with HMLS, UAS-SfM and ALS densities and UAS-SfM and HMLS densities were moderately correlated with ALS densities. Including field-measured plot-level canopy base height (CBH) improved most correlations at medium and high CBH, especially those including UAS-SfM data. The most significant generalized linear model to predict RdNBR included interactions between CBH and ladder fuel densities at specific 1-m stratum collected using TLS, ALS, and HMLS approaches (R 2 = 0.67, 0.66, and 0.44, respectively). Results imply that remote sensing approaches for ladder fuel density can be used interchangeably in oak woodlands, except UAS-SfM combined with the photo banner. Additionally, ...
نوع الوثيقة: dataset
اللغة: unknown
Relation: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Comparing_Remote_Sensing_and_Field-Based_Approaches_to_Estimate_Ladder_Fuels_and_Predict_Wildfire_Burn_Severity_zip/19523875
DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.818713.s001
الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.818713.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Comparing_Remote_Sensing_and_Field-Based_Approaches_to_Estimate_Ladder_Fuels_and_Predict_Wildfire_Burn_Severity_zip/19523875
Rights: CC BY 4.0
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.6AA2068A
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
DOI:10.3389/ffgc.2022.818713.s001