Academic Journal
Breakeven price of CO2 credits driving farmers to use the area to plant forest instead of grain ; Preço de equilíbrio dos créditos de CO2 levando os agricultores a usar a área para plantar florestas em vez de grãos
| العنوان: | Breakeven price of CO2 credits driving farmers to use the area to plant forest instead of grain ; Preço de equilíbrio dos créditos de CO2 levando os agricultores a usar a área para plantar florestas em vez de grãos |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Palumbo, Marco, Ferraz-Almeida, Risely |
| المصدر: | Ciência Florestal; Vol. 33 No. 3 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e73352 ; Ciência Florestal; v. 33 n. 3 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e73352 ; 1980-5098 ; 0103-9954 |
| بيانات النشر: | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria: Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFSM |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Carbon offset, Soybeans, Eucalyptus, Carbon credit, Reforestation, Compensação de carbono, Soja, Eucalipto, Crédito de carbono, Reflorestamento |
| الوصف: | Afforestation and reforestation were the challenges the farmer can seize to plant a culture that can capture more carbon than the amount emitted for cultivation. Assuming that the land was legally rented and owned, and part of an area that had not been obtained through recent deforestation, the main questions were: “why a farmer should have preferred to reserve the area to plant trees?”; and “How much did one ton of Carbon Dioxide [CO2] have to be rewarded to buy this opportunity?” This work had the target to estimate which was the minimum price for carbon credit so that the farmer will plant a forest instead of using the soil for grain cultivation. Based on the analysis that economic aspects and profit were the main drivers considered by the farmer to decide how to use the soil in case the area was not classified as Legal Reserve or Permanent Protection Area, seeking the usage which maximized the value per hectare. Considering a eucalyptus commercial forest planted under the premises of the current study, results showed that a price of around 24 BRL per ton of CO2 in 2021 is enough to turn it economically feasible. Business case had been estimated with and without profit coming from the commercial use of forest, and even assuming that no wood is cut and sold, the 2021 price of 40,48 BRL per ton of CO2 can ensure more profit than grain production over 14 years timeframe, allowing the farmer to make money beyond the usual commercial use of a forest. ; Florestar e reflorestar foram os desafios que o agricultor pode enfrentar para plantar uma cultura capaz de capturar mais carbono do que a quantidade emitida para o cultivo. Partindo do pressuposto de que a terra era legalmente arrendada e própria, e parte de uma área que não havia sido obtida por meio de desmatamento recente, as principais questões eram: “por que um agricultor teria preferido reservar a área para plantar árvores?” e “Quanto uma tonelada de Dióxido de Carbono [CO2] teve que ser recompensada para comprar esta oportunidade?” Este trabalho teve como ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| Relation: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/73352/61817; https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/73352 |
| DOI: | 10.5902/1980509873352 |
| الاتاحة: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/73352 https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509873352 |
| Rights: | Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência Florestal ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.65FB75F |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.5902/1980509873352 |
|---|