Academic Journal
Perceptions and attitudes regarding delayed antibiotic prescription for respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study
| العنوان: | Perceptions and attitudes regarding delayed antibiotic prescription for respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Mas-Dalmau, Gemma, Pequeño-Saco, Sandra, de la Poza-Abad, Mariam, Borrell-Thió, Eulàlia, Besa-Castellà, Marta, Alsina-Casalduero, Maria, Cuixart-Costa, Lluís, Liroz-Navarro, Mercedes, Calderón-Gómez, Carlos, Martí, Joel, Cruz-Gómez, Irene, Alonso-Coello, Pablo |
| المصدر: | BMC Primary Care ; volume 24, issue 1 ; ISSN 2731-4553 |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| الوصف: | Background Antibiotics are overprescribed for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). However, the decision to prescribe is often complex. Delayed antibiotic prescription (DAP), a strategy designed to promote more rational antibiotic use, is still not widely used. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions and attitudes in primary care professionals, regarding antibiotic use and different DAP strategies for uncomplicated RTIs. Methods We conducted a qualitative study, using an inductive thematic approach to generate themes, based on focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews with professionals, recruited from 6 primary care centres (Barcelona metropolitan area, Spain). Results 26 professionals (25 family physicians and one nurse) were included in four focus group discussions and three semi-structured interviews. Participants commented that RTIs were a main reason for consultation, motivated often by patient anxiety and fear of possible complications, and this was associated with the patients’ poor health-related education. Acknowledging inappropriate antibiotic use in the health system, participants attributed this, mainly to defensive medicine strategies. DAP was used when in doubt about the aetiology, and considering factors related to patient-physician interactions. The main perceived advantage of DAP was that it could reduce the need for additional visits, while the main disadvantage was uncertainty regarding proper use by the patient. Conclusions DAP was used by participants in cases of doubt, in specific situations, and for specific patient profiles. Weak points were detected in our primary care system and its users that affect the proper use of both antibiotics and DAP, namely, time pressure on professionals, poor patient health-related education, and the lack of a patient-physician relationship in some scenarios. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4.pdf |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4/fulltext.html |
| الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4/fulltext.html |
| Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.64FA5934 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4 |
|---|