Academic Journal
Challenges and opportunities for harmonizing research methodology: Raw accelerometry.
| العنوان: | Challenges and opportunities for harmonizing research methodology: Raw accelerometry. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | van Hees, V.T., Thaler-Kall, K., Wolf, K.H., Brønd, J.C., Bonomi, A., Schulze, M., Vigl, M., Morseth, B., Hopstock, L.A., Gorzelniak, L., Schulz, H., Brage, S., Horsch, A. |
| المصدر: | Methods Inf. Med. 55, 525-532 (2016) |
| بيانات النشر: | Schattauer Gmbh-verlag Medizin Naturwissenschaften |
| سنة النشر: | 2016 |
| المجموعة: | PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Accelerometer, Physical Activity, Raw Data, Standardization |
| الوصف: | Objectives: Raw accelerometry is increasingly being used in physical activity research, but diversity in sensor design, attachment and signal processing challenges the comparability of research results. Therefore, efforts are needed to harmonize the methodology. In this article we reflect on how increased methodological harmonization may be achieved. Methods: The authors of this work convened for a two-day workshop (March 2014) themed on methodological harmonization of raw accelerometry. The discussions at the workshop were used as a basis for this review. Results: Key stakeholders were identified as manufacturers, method developers, method users (application), publishers, and funders. To facilitate methodological harmonization in raw accelerometry the following action points were proposed: i) Manufacturers are encouraged to provide a detailed specification of their sensors, ii) Each fundamental step of algorithms for processing raw accelerometer data should be documented, and ideally also motivated, to facilitate interpretation and discussion, iii) Algorithm developers and method users should be open about uncertainties in the description of data and the uncertainty of the inference itself, iv) All new algorithms which are pitched as "ready for implementation" should be shared with the community to facilitate replication and ongoing evaluation by independent groups, and v) A dynamic interaction between method stakeholders should be encouraged to facilitate a well-informed harmonization process. Conclusions: The workshop led to the iden - tification of a number of opportunities for harmonizing methodological practice. The discussion as well as the practical checklists proposed in this review should provide guidance for stakeholders on how to contribute to increased harmonization. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 0026-1270 2511-705X |
| Relation: | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/27714396; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000389622500007; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/0026-1270; info:eu-repo/semantics/altId; https://push-zb.helmholtz-muenchen.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=50187; urn:isbn:0026-1270; urn:issn:0026-1270; urn:issn:2511-705X |
| DOI: | 10.3414/ME15-05-0013 |
| الاتاحة: | https://push-zb.helmholtz-muenchen.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=50187 https://doi.org/10.3414/ME15-05-0013 |
| Rights: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.6432CCDF |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| تدمد: | 00261270 2511705X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3414/ME15-05-0013 |