Academic Journal
The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study
| العنوان: | The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Rosário, S, Azevedo, LF, Fonseca, JA, Nienhaus, A, Nübling, M, da Costa, JT |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| المجموعة: | Repositório Comum (RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Professional Burnout, Saúde Mental, Doenças Profissionais, Burnout, Professional, Inquéritos e Questionários, Occupational Diseases, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Health |
| الوصف: | BACKGROUND: Psychosocial risks are now widely recognised as one of the biggest challenges for occupational safety and health (OSH) and a major public health concern. The aim of this paper is to investigate the Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II), in order to analyse the psychometric properties of the instrument and to validate it. METHODS: The Portuguese COPSOQ II was issued to a total of 745 Portuguese employees from both private and public organisations across several economic sectors at a baseline and then 2 weeks later. Methodological quality appraisal was based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations. An analysis of the psychometric properties of the long version of COPSOQ II (internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficient, floor and ceiling effects, response rate, missing values, mean and standard deviation, exploratory factor analysis) was performed to determine the validity and reliability of the instrument. RESULTS: The COPSOQ II had a response rate of 60.6% (test) and a follow-up response rate of 59.5% (retest). In general, a Cronbach's alpha of the COPSOQ scales (test and retest) was above the conventional threshold of 0.70. The test-retest reliability estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed a higher reliability for most of the scales, above the conventional 0.7, except for eight scales. The proportion of the missing values was less than 1.3%, except for two scales. The average scores and standard deviations showed similar results to the original Danish study, except for eight scales. All of the scales had low floor and ceiling effects, with one exception. Overall, the exploratory factor analysis presented good results in 27 scales assuming a reflective measurement model. The hypothesized factor structure under a reflective model was not supported in 14 scales and for some but not all of these scales the explanation may be a formative measurement model. ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| Relation: | J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017 Aug 9;12:24.; http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/18864 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9 |
| الاتاحة: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/18864 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9 |
| Rights: | openAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.512D97A0 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9 |
|---|