Academic Journal
Transdisciplinary disposal governance – Learning and reflexion in and between organisations and through participation of the public
| العنوان: | Transdisciplinary disposal governance – Learning and reflexion in and between organisations and through participation of the public |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Mbah, Melanie, Brohmann, Bettina, Schütte, Silvia |
| بيانات النشر: | Copernicus Publications |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| المجموعة: | Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek Hannover) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | article, Verlagsveröffentlichung |
| الوصف: | The site selection procedure is participatory and citizens are to be involved as “co-designers of the procedure” (§ 5 (1) 2 StandAG). This is an understanding of participation that goes beyond information and consultation. Although participation is differently defined in participation research, there is agreement that participation – especially in this context – goes beyond formal public participation, as is customary in approval procedures in the context of commenting procedures, and includes forms of informal public participation (cf. Mbah, 2017). Further innovative forms of public participation are needed in which concepts – for participation, for learning, for reversibility, etc. – can be (further) developed. Paragraph 5 (3) stipulates a further development of the participation procedure with the public. On the one hand, this provides framework conditions and, on the other hand, opens up a scope for design, which must be designed together with different groups of actors. This requirement was formulated both before and within the framework of the sub-areas conference (cf. Brohmann et al., 2021; Ewer and Thienel, 2019; Kuhbier, 2020; NBG, 2019, 2021). Therefore, we would like to address the following research questions: What does “learning” mean in the German Site Selection Act (StandAG 2017, § 1 (2)) and how can it be governed and implemented? Who learns and under which conditions? What are the requirements and possibilities of participation and what limitations can be derived in this context? Knowledge and information are the basis of all decision-making processes. Learning is part of a reflexive information exchange and essential for creating, transferring, and readjusting knowledge. In this respect, learning and reflexion means at least a two-way process, often multiple ways and loops. Therefore, we would like to focus on reflexive learning processes, so called double-loop learning processes (Argyris, 1977; Argyris and Schön, 1978) that consider that there should be responsive paths of knowledge transfer ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | electronic |
| اللغة: | English |
| Relation: | Safety of nuclear waste disposal -- https://www.safety-of-nuclear-waste-disposal.net/ -- https://sand.copernicus.org/articles/1/index.html -- 2749-4802; https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-221-2021; https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00058748; https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00058372/sand-1-221-2021.pdf; https://sand.copernicus.org/articles/1/221/2021/sand-1-221-2021.pdf |
| DOI: | 10.5194/sand-1-221-2021 |
| الاتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-221-2021 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00058748 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00058372/sand-1-221-2021.pdf https://sand.copernicus.org/articles/1/221/2021/sand-1-221-2021.pdf |
| Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; uneingeschränkt ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.4D3DC485 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.5194/sand-1-221-2021 |
|---|